From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:47:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1331281886-11667-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> <1331288715.21444.38.camel@beez.lab.cmartin.tk> <4F5A4C45.7070406@xiplink.com> <4F5AF1A8.4050604@alum.mit.edu> <4F5E12A5.6030701@xiplink.com> <20120312183725.GA2187@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jeff King , Marc Branchaud , Michael Haggerty , Carlos =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn?= Nieto , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Dmitry Potapov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 14 15:52:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pYh-0001YJ-DZ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:52:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965295Ab2CNOwF (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:52:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.imag.fr ([129.88.30.5]:50908 "EHLO shiva.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965296Ab2CNOwD (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:52:03 -0400 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by shiva.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2EEgtsd026948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:42:55 +0100 Received: from bauges.imag.fr ([129.88.7.32]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pU2-0004oC-7x; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:47:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Potapov's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:23:33 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (shiva.imag.fr [129.88.30.5]); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:42:57 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-MailScanner-ID: q2EEgtsd026948 X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1332340979.48682@rK/ecnpI3lzTe1eCEP3f+w Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Dmitry Potapov writes: > Not of course. I said above non-fast forward push should not be used by > beginners. Do you mean "beginners should not force non-fast forward push", or "beginners should not use flow where push may be denied because of non-fast forward"? If the second, this implies that beginners should never have a shared repository, either shared for one user and multiple machines, or shared between developers? If you mean that shared repositories are too complex for beginners, my experience is exactly the opposite. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/