From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robin H. Johnson" Subject: Re: git clone failing over slow links? Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:49:18 -0700 Message-ID: References: <2729632a0906090852r124eff8eo8391ae90cbda5872@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" To: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 09 20:49:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ME6OG-0005C0-EA for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:49:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754436AbZFIStV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:49:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753152AbZFIStV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:49:21 -0400 Received: from b01.ext.isohunt.com ([208.71.112.51]:48101 "EHLO mail.isohunt.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754178AbZFIStV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:49:21 -0400 Received: (qmail 15071 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 18:49:22 -0000 Received: from tsi-static.orbis-terrarum.net (HELO curie.orbis-terrarum.net) (76.10.188.108) (smtp-auth username robbat2@isohunt.com, mechanism login) by mail.isohunt.com (qpsmtpd/0.33-dev on beta01) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:49:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 22524 invoked by uid 10000); 9 Jun 2009 11:49:18 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 02:42:46PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > For Gentoo, we saw what I think was same problem early on with our > > conversion experiments. In our case however, it's going to be a > > non-problem as we intend on disabling initial clone and requiring use of > > a bundle. > In the Gentoo case, I think your problem was rather about the memory=20 > usage impact of an initial clone and nothing to do with the speed of the= =20 > connection. That was true early on, but it still persists for users on slow connections. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks - The text below is a digital signature. If it doesn't make any sense to you, ignore it. iEYEARECAAYFAkourq4ACgkQPpIsIjIzwiw1RQCfb4SqhORtU0m89jxcSEYKwk71 DnsAoOwEGc+ohmfVG20vPCqMahVxGE9y =9y1N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--