From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robin H. Johnson" Subject: Re: git clone failing over slow links? Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:12:32 -0700 Message-ID: References: <2729632a0906090852r124eff8eo8391ae90cbda5872@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 09 19:12:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ME4sR-0008S8-Sj for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:12:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755248AbZFIRMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:12:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755025AbZFIRMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:12:36 -0400 Received: from b01.ext.isohunt.com ([208.71.112.51]:44494 "EHLO mail.isohunt.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754332AbZFIRMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:12:36 -0400 Received: (qmail 14434 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 17:12:35 -0000 Received: from tsi-static.orbis-terrarum.net (HELO curie.orbis-terrarum.net) (76.10.188.108) (smtp-auth username robbat2@isohunt.com, mechanism login) by mail.isohunt.com (qpsmtpd/0.33-dev on beta01) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:12:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 5093 invoked by uid 10000); 9 Jun 2009 10:12:32 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2729632a0906090852r124eff8eo8391ae90cbda5872@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 08:52:10AM -0700, skillzero@gmail.com wrote: > People with slower connections are having problems cloning my > repository. The server seems to just drop the connection. This > repository is about 300 MB. The server is using git 1.6.1. This is > using an ssh URL. They've tried many times and it usually dies at > different places in the clone (5%, 80%, etc., with one successful > clone so far for them). For Gentoo, we saw what I think was same problem early on with our conversion experiments. In our case however, it's going to be a non-problem as we intend on disabling initial clone and requiring use of a bundle. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85