git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn1313@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 01:11:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.820.v4.git.1608599513.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.820.v3.git.1608516320.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

If remote.origin.push was set to ":", git segfaults during a push operation,
due to bad parsing logic in query_matches_negative_refspec. Per bisect, the
bug was introduced in: c0192df630 (refspec: add support for negative
refspecs, 2020-09-30)

We found this issue when rolling out git 2.29 at Dropbox - as several folks
had "push = :" in their configuration. I based my diff off the master
branch, but also confirmed that it patches cleanly onto maint - if the
maintainers would like to also fix the segfault on 2.29

Update since Patch series V1:

 * Handled matching refspec explicitly
 * Added testing for "+:" case
 * Added comment explaining how the two loops work together

Update since Patch series V2

 * style suggestion in remote.c
 * Use test_config
 * Add test for a case with a matching refspec + negative refspec
 * Fix test_config to work with --add
 * Updated commit message to describe what git is told to do instead of
   segfaulting

Update since Patch series V3

 * Removed commit modifying test_config
 * Remove segfault-related comments in test
 * Consolidate the three tests to two tests (1st and 3rd test overlapped in
   functionality)
 * Base the patch series on the maint branch - since the bug affects 2.29.2

Appreciate the reviews from Junio and Eric! Happy Holidays!

Nipunn Koorapati (2):
  negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
  negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec

 remote.c                          | 16 +++++++++++++---
 t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


base-commit: 898f80736c75878acc02dc55672317fcc0e0a5a6
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-820%2Fnipunn1313%2Fnk%2Fpush-refspec-segfault-v4
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-820/nipunn1313/nk/push-refspec-segfault-v4
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/820

Range-diff vs v3:

 1:  733c674bd19 < -:  ----------- test-lib-functions: handle --add in test_config
 2:  20cff2f5c59 ! 1:  e59ff29bdef negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
     @@ Commit message
          (refspec: add support for negative refspecs, 2020-09-30) looks at
          refspec->src assuming it is never NULL, however when
          remote.origin.push is set to ":", then refspec->src is NULL,
     -    causing a segfault within strcmp
     +    causing a segfault within strcmp.
      
          Tell git to handle matching refspec by adding the needle to the
          set of positively matched refspecs, since matching ":" refspecs
          match anything as src.
      
     -    Added testing for matching refspec pushes fetch-negative-refspec
     -    both individually and in combination with a negative refspec
     +    Add test for matching refspec pushes fetch-negative-refspec
     +    both individually and in combination with a negative refspec.
      
          Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
      
     @@ t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh: test_expect_success "fetch --prune with negat
       	)
       '
       
     -+test_expect_success "push with matching ':' refspec" '
     ++test_expect_success "push with matching : and negative refspec" '
      +	test_config -C two remote.one.push : &&
     -+	# Fails w/ tip behind counterpart - but should not segfault
     -+	test_must_fail git -C two push one
     -+'
     ++	# Fails to push master w/ tip behind counterpart
     ++	test_must_fail git -C two push one &&
      +
     -+test_expect_success "push with matching '+:' refspec" '
     -+	test_config -C two remote.one.push +: &&
     -+	# Fails w/ tip behind counterpart - but should not segfault
     -+	test_must_fail git -C two push one
     ++	# If master is in negative refspec, then the command will not attempt
     ++	# to push and succeed.
     ++	# We do not need test_config here as we are updating remote.one.push
     ++	# again. The teardown of the first test_config will do --unset-all
     ++	git -C two config --add remote.one.push ^refs/heads/master &&
     ++	git -C two push one
      +'
      +
     -+test_expect_success "push with matching and negative refspec" '
     -+	test_config -C two --add remote.one.push : &&
     ++test_expect_success "push with matching +: and negative refspec" '
     ++	test_config -C two remote.one.push +: &&
      +	# Fails to push master w/ tip behind counterpart
      +	test_must_fail git -C two push one &&
      +
     -+	# If master is in negative refspec, then the command will succeed
     -+	test_config -C two --add remote.one.push ^refs/heads/master &&
     ++	# If master is in negative refspec, then the command will not attempt
     ++	# to push and succeed
     ++	git -C two config --add remote.one.push ^refs/heads/master &&
      +	git -C two push one
      +'
      +
 3:  0fd4e9f7459 = 2:  20575407cc0 negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec

-- 
gitgitgadget

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-22  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-19 17:23 [PATCH] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-19 18:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-19  9:28   ` Jacob Keller
2020-12-19 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-19 21:58   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-20  2:57     ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-19 21:58   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21  2:05   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21  2:05     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] test-lib-functions: handle --add in test_config Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21  7:07       ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21 19:00         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-21 20:08           ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-22  0:00             ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-22  0:13               ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-22  2:25                 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-22  5:19                   ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21  2:05     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21  7:20       ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21  2:05     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  1:11     ` Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget [this message]
2020-12-22  1:11       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  2:08         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22  2:28           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22  1:11       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  3:58       ` [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  3:58         ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19  9:32           ` Jacob Keller
2020-12-22  3:58         ` [PATCH v5 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  6:48         ` [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Junio C Hamano
2020-12-23 23:56           ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-24  0:00             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-11 20:22               ` Nipunn Koorapati
2021-01-12  2:01                 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pull.820.v4.git.1608599513.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nipunn1313@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).