From: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>, Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>, Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] Remove the present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE class of bugs (for sparse-checkouts) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:59:38 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <pull.1114.v2.git.1642175983.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <pull.1114.git.1642092230.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Maintainer note: This series builds on (v2 of) vd/sparse-clean-etc, because it tweaks one of the testcases added there.) (Note 2: There was a previous RFC round of this series at https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220109045732.2497526-1-newren@gmail.com/.) Files in the present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE state have caused no ends of discussions and bugs[1,2,3,4,5,6,...and lots of others]. Trying to address the big issue of discovering & recovering from this state has befuddled me for over a year because I was worried we'd need additional code at every skip_worktree-checking path in the code (and they are all over the place), and that we'd make the code significantly slower unless we plumbed a bunch of additional information all over the place to allow some reasonable optimizations. This series tries to solve the problem a bit differently by automatic early discovery and recovery; as a result, it greatly simplifies the landscape, reduces our testing matrix burden, and fixes a large swath of bugs. And I figured out how to get the perf cost down to essentially negligible. Changes since v1 (or v2 if you count RFC as v1): * now includes some fixes for testcases from ds/fetch-pull-with-sparse-index (which topic marked its own new tests as potentially suboptimal; with my series, the sparse behavior now matches the full tree behavior on that test. Wahoo!). Note that Junio's version of vd/sparse-clean-etc already includes ds/fetch-pull-with-sparse-index, so no need to merge in anything extra. Changes since RFC version: * updated the commit messages as per suggestions from Victoria, including adding performance measurements * renamed the new function to use a clearer name * replaced the final patch with a different optimization, which is both simpler and performs quite a bit better (the cost for my previous patch 5 was already decent in many cases, but had a few cases where the cost was significant). Quick overview: * Patches 1 & 2 add a test to demonstrate accidental deletion of possibly-modified files, and then fix the bug. * Patch 3 is the crux of this series; a small amount of code with a huge commit message * Patch 4 updates the documentation * Patch 5 adds an optimization to reduce the performance impact of patch 3 [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BFnFpzwGC11TLoLs8YK5yiisA5D5-fFjXnJsbESVDwZsA@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGJ_Nvi5TmgriD9Bh6eNXE2EDq2f8e8QKXAeYG3BxZafA@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.809.git.git.1592356884310.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ [4] commit 66b209b ("merge-ort: implement CE_SKIP_WORKTREE handling with conflicted entries", 2021-03-20) [5] commit ba359fd ("stash: fix stash application in sparse-checkouts", 2020-12-01) [6] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BH9tju7WVm=QZDOvaMDdZbpNXrVWQdN-jmfN8wC6YVhmw@mail.gmail.com/ Elijah Newren (5): t1011: add testcase demonstrating accidental loss of user modifications unpack-trees: fix accidental loss of user changes repo_read_index: clear SKIP_WORKTREE bit from files present in worktree Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit Accelerate clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files() by caching Documentation/git-read-tree.txt | 12 +++- Documentation/git-sparse-checkout.txt | 76 ++++++++++++++---------- Documentation/git-update-index.txt | 57 +++++++++++++----- repository.c | 7 +++ sparse-index.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++ sparse-index.h | 1 + t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh | 23 ++++++- t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh | 41 ++++++------- t/t3705-add-sparse-checkout.sh | 2 + t/t6428-merge-conflicts-sparse.sh | 23 ++----- t/t7012-skip-worktree-writing.sh | 44 +++----------- t/t7817-grep-sparse-checkout.sh | 11 +++- unpack-trees.c | 4 +- 13 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-) base-commit: 48609de3bf32befb69c40c1a2595a98dac0448b4 Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1114%2Fnewren%2Ffix-present-despite-skip-worktree-v2 Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1114/newren/fix-present-despite-skip-worktree-v2 Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1114 Range-diff vs v1: 1: c553d558c2f = 1: d50d804af4e t1011: add testcase demonstrating accidental loss of user modifications 2: 1e3958576e2 = 2: 206c638fa90 unpack-trees: fix accidental loss of user changes 3: b263cc75b7d ! 3: 11d46a399d2 repo_read_index: clear SKIP_WORKTREE bit from files present in worktree @@ t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh: test_expect_success 'update-index modi # When skip-worktree is disabled (even on files outside sparse cone), file # is updated in the index +@@ t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh: test_expect_success 'ls-files' ' + test_cmp dense sparse && + + # Set up a strange condition of having a file edit +- # outside of the sparse-checkout cone. This is just +- # to verify that sparse-checkout and sparse-index +- # behave the same in this case. ++ # outside of the sparse-checkout cone. We want to verify ++ # that all modes handle this the same, and detect the ++ # modification. + write_script edit-content <<-\EOF && +- mkdir folder1 && ++ mkdir -p folder1 && + echo content >>folder1/a + EOF +- run_on_sparse ../edit-content && ++ run_on_all ../edit-content && + +- # ls-files does not currently notice modified files whose +- # cache entries are marked SKIP_WORKTREE. This may change +- # in the future, but here we test that sparse index does +- # not accidentally create a change of behavior. +- test_sparse_match git ls-files --modified && +- test_must_be_empty sparse-checkout-out && +- test_must_be_empty sparse-index-out && ++ test_all_match git ls-files --modified && + + git -C sparse-index ls-files --sparse --modified >sparse-index-out && +- test_must_be_empty sparse-index-out && ++ cat >expect <<-\EOF && ++ folder1/a ++ EOF ++ test_cmp expect sparse-index-out && + + # Add folder1 to the sparse-checkout cone and + # check that ls-files shows the expanded files. + test_sparse_match git sparse-checkout add folder1 && +- test_sparse_match git ls-files --modified && ++ test_all_match git ls-files --modified && + + test_all_match git ls-files && + git -C sparse-index ls-files --sparse >actual && ## t/t3705-add-sparse-checkout.sh ## @@ t/t3705-add-sparse-checkout.sh: setup_sparse_entry () { 4: c74ad19616e = 4: 0af00779128 Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit 5: e68028ebe0a = 5: 05ac964e630 Accelerate clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files() by caching -- gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-14 15:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-13 16:43 [PATCH " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] t1011: add testcase demonstrating accidental loss of user modifications Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] unpack-trees: fix accidental loss of user changes Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] repo_read_index: clear SKIP_WORKTREE bit from files present in worktree Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] Accelerate clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files() by caching Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 23:35 ` Elijah Newren 2022-01-14 15:59 ` Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget [this message] 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] t1011: add testcase demonstrating accidental loss of user modifications Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-02-16 8:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2022-02-16 16:02 ` Elijah Newren 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] unpack-trees: fix accidental loss of user changes Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] repo_read_index: clear SKIP_WORKTREE bit from files present in worktree Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-02-16 8:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2022-02-16 16:08 ` Elijah Newren 2022-02-19 1:06 ` Jonathan Nieder 2022-02-19 16:42 ` Elijah Newren 2022-02-19 18:14 ` Jonathan Nieder 2022-02-20 5:28 ` Elijah Newren 2022-02-20 16:56 ` Derrick Stolee 2022-02-22 23:17 ` Jonathan Nieder 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-02-16 9:15 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2022-02-16 16:21 ` Elijah Newren 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Accelerate clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files() by caching Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-15 1:39 ` Victoria Dye 2022-02-16 9:32 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2022-02-16 16:30 ` Elijah Newren 2022-02-17 4:40 ` Elijah Newren 2022-01-15 1:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Remove the present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE class of bugs (for sparse-checkouts) Victoria Dye
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=pull.1114.v2.git.1642175983.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \ --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \ --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lessleydennington@gmail.com \ --cc=newren@gmail.com \ --cc=stolee@gmail.com \ --cc=vdye@github.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Remove the present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE class of bugs (for sparse-checkouts)' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).