git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, pclouds@gmail.com,
	Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>,
	Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] dir: force untracked cache with core.untrackedCache
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:00:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.1058.v2.git.1645131630140.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1058.git.1644860224151.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>

The GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE environment variable writes the untracked
cache more frequently than the core.untrackedCache config variable. This
is due to how read_directory() handles the creation of an untracked
cache.

Before this change, Git would not create the untracked cache extension
for an index that did not already have one. Users would need to run a
command such as 'git update-index --untracked-cache' before the index
would actually contain an untracked cache.

In particular, users noticed that the untracked cache would not appear
even with core.untrackedCache=true. Some users reported setting
GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE=1 in their engineering system environment to
ensure the untracked cache would be created.

The decision to not write the untracked cache without an environment
variable tracks back to fc9ecbeb9 (dir.c: don't flag the index as dirty
for changes to the untracked cache, 2018-02-05). The motivation of that
change is that writing the index is expensive, and if the untracked
cache is the only thing that needs to be written, then it is more
expensive than the benefit of the cache. However, this also means that
the untracked cache never gets populated, so the user who enabled it via
config does not actually get the extension until running 'git
update-index --untracked-cache' manually or using the environment
variable.

We have had a version of this change in the microsoft/git fork for a few
major releases now. It has been working well to get users into a good
state. Yes, that first index write is slow, but the remaining index
writes are much faster than they would be without this change.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
---
    dir: force untracked cache with core.untrackedCache
    
    We have seen users in the wild that have had core.untrackedCache
    enabled, but never actually have an untracked cache created for them. We
    have a test in t7063 that shows git status should write the untracked
    cache, so I'm not exactly sure how users are in this state for long.
    
    This patch fixes the situation. I also know of another group that sets
    GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE=1 in their developer environment in order to
    get this behavior.
    
    -Stolee
    
    
    Update in v2
    ============
    
     * Edited the commit message to be clearer.

Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1058%2Fderrickstolee%2Funtracked-cache-write-more-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1058/derrickstolee/untracked-cache-write-more-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1058

Range-diff vs v1:

 1:  061ee9a379d ! 1:  8d132bc5566 dir: force untracked cache with core.untrackedCache
     @@ Commit message
          The GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE environment variable writes the untracked
          cache more frequently than the core.untrackedCache config variable. This
          is due to how read_directory() handles the creation of an untracked
     -    cache. The old mechanism required using something like 'git update-index
     -    --untracked-cache' before the index would actually contain an untracked
     -    cache. This was noted as a performance problem on macOS in the past, and
     -    this is a resolution for that issue.
     +    cache.
     +
     +    Before this change, Git would not create the untracked cache extension
     +    for an index that did not already have one. Users would need to run a
     +    command such as 'git update-index --untracked-cache' before the index
     +    would actually contain an untracked cache.
     +
     +    In particular, users noticed that the untracked cache would not appear
     +    even with core.untrackedCache=true. Some users reported setting
     +    GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE=1 in their engineering system environment to
     +    ensure the untracked cache would be created.
      
          The decision to not write the untracked cache without an environment
          variable tracks back to fc9ecbeb9 (dir.c: don't flag the index as dirty


 dir.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
index d91295f2bcd..79a5f6918c8 100644
--- a/dir.c
+++ b/dir.c
@@ -2936,7 +2936,9 @@ int read_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, struct index_state *istate,
 
 		if (force_untracked_cache < 0)
 			force_untracked_cache =
-				git_env_bool("GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE", 0);
+				git_env_bool("GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE", -1);
+		if (force_untracked_cache < 0)
+			force_untracked_cache = (istate->repo->settings.core_untracked_cache == UNTRACKED_CACHE_WRITE);
 		if (force_untracked_cache &&
 			dir->untracked == istate->untracked &&
 		    (dir->untracked->dir_opened ||

base-commit: b80121027d1247a0754b3cc46897fee75c050b44
-- 
gitgitgadget

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-17 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-14 17:37 [PATCH] dir: force untracked cache with core.untrackedCache Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-02-14 20:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-14 20:40   ` Derrick Stolee
2022-02-17 21:00 ` Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget [this message]
2022-02-17 22:51   ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pull.1058.v2.git.1645131630140.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).