[PATCH 2/5] sparse-index.c: expand_to_path() can assume non-NULL "istate"

["Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>]

This function added in [1] was subsequently used in [2]. All of the
calls to it are in name-hash.c, and come after calls to
lazy_init_name_hash(istate). The first thing that function does is:

	if (istate->name_hash_initialized)
		return;

So we can already assume that we have a non-NULL "istate" here, or
we'd be segfaulting. Let's not confuse matters by making it appear
that's not the case.

1. 71f82d032f3 (sparse-index: expand_to_path(), 2021-04-12)
2. 4589bca829a (name-hash: use expand_to_path(), 2021-04-12)

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
---
 sparse-index.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sparse-index.c b/sparse-index.c
index 8c269dab803..65a08d33c73 100644
--- a/sparse-index.c
+++ b/sparse-index.c
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ void expand_to_path(struct index_state *istate,
 	if (in_expand_to_path)
 		return;
 
-	if (!istate || !istate->sparse_index)
+	if (!istate->sparse_index)
 		return;
 
 	if (!istate->repo)
-- 
2.39.0.1195.gabc92c078c4