From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3091F542 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 03:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221208 header.b=m+gbraS4; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242794AbjFODDS (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:03:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42678 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241234AbjFODDJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:03:09 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com (mail-yb1-xb49.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF51226A9 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 20:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-babb78a3daaso1620451276.1 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 20:03:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1686798188; x=1689390188; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lU/n0ZcAOk08/vj8CExcytkriiLTte265UVa3cudcdY=; b=m+gbraS4rkW9+jA1YWQYehi8kjyyihoXY81IkB86J58ccKXmpMjWfDpIPVSuuKCCRk cModVW+sDn+PbxqBN87rbr2uLkhcZqYz6K8hO7Z7SYSdGPyh/v0bhiAGaziaA/GyBBrb Vj/BibbyY/KnEYadZY01oMBO3vd+ELOugH6jDILdeI+oH6v/1/FVi1ZLdrUbdIrm8JE5 a2OUFXgg9e6KXbTDRrvsawjgoWPCGTrWk+GOjLyU0VnK6SnfWTxPB05zQNuu0XCNCqDJ O9IV56ou9zgVJJYgTJNgBJcSxsOMLulJoZJX1UwanoZi6A0sF4U+AMp4fQRBj3TlMaVr LgLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686798188; x=1689390188; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lU/n0ZcAOk08/vj8CExcytkriiLTte265UVa3cudcdY=; b=W8KhRWfNDSACnkCzCFWVG4vNsQJ9S4/aURfQKQEM3O6bTQszOVvceZp371fpEYgWjb mlg9YT0luiLShDyv1wr1hfY5zq0nICciDik7m8g5DDS7VZIiwPMcXkZ0qYzHbRRxMv0T SmtE9OFg7NCG7WidcuMj0IkOG6Mn3fkAlWnBxvJub2INQDX0xiHnlxQRx/sf3aFrnxJc LlAh2KXFcjlgM9y7MOhM71hcQzRBD3mmjuBLMHdSZm/VsiaZ276zs5NpzfuqdG6XLj3T NAxG3ty6ayaG8szbGRMNKu04lmjRNPkiyn5xX0oNUGGbHJTvLCd6oo5dCydCQbE6qiFb wdig== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwwIruE/fnu1UdAmQ9fPWxUFAO5eFbOlZ3yBgrt8PO3JXWoDvDl KMyjkWH/Jk7negfTuqy1z522YBhtITM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4UiOLZzm6P01FrryVFcJDMFkPPI0eVMqIgy+4Wz9BZHufOO36GshhfCxmCtt+TaHfuJYamU/ttcUQ= X-Received: from fine.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:2221]) (user=linusa job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:69ce:0:b0:bd1:7934:b4fe with SMTP id e197-20020a2569ce000000b00bd17934b4femr1597137ybc.13.1686798188028; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 20:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 20:03:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <52f7d29f509070a17a32a6f1c888588cc87e6cb9.1686017304.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] doc: trailer: examples: avoid the word "message" by itself From: Linus Arver To: Christian Couder , Linus Arver via GitGitGadget Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; delsp=yes Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Christian Couder writes: >> $ git config trailer.sign.key "Signed-off-by" >> $ cat msg.txt >> subject >> -message >> +Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. > I am not sure this change is clarifying anything. If you want > something clearer for "internal body text inside the commit message", > you could perhaps just use "body" or "body text". > I am not against using such latin words, but then why only in the body > and not in the subject too? And if it's used in the subject too, then > I am not sure it will make it easy for users to understand that the > example is using a simple commit message. I can't remember why I didn't just use "body text", which I agree is better than the (albeit famous) Latin phrase. It's shorter, simpler, and also search-friendly (for cases where the user is not sure of exactly which word they want to search for). Updated in v4 to use "body text".