From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael J Gruber <git@grubix.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] http.c: clear the 'finished' member once we are done with it
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 01:41:02 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2205240124280.352@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr14jluu4.fsf@gitster.g>
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 23 May 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > I stumbled over the need for this while investigating the build failures
> > caused by upgrading Git for Windows' SDK's GCC to v12.x.
> >
> >> diff --git a/http.c b/http.c
> >> index 229da4d148..85437b1980 100644
> >> --- a/http.c
> >> +++ b/http.c
> >> @@ -1367,6 +1367,9 @@ void run_active_slot(struct active_request_slot *slot)
> >> select(max_fd+1, &readfds, &writefds, &excfds, &select_timeout);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + if (slot->finished == &finished)
> >> + slot->finished = NULL;
> >
> > First of all, I suspect that
> > https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.36.1/http.c#L1207 makes sure that GCC's
> > complaint is not actually accurate: we always re-set `finished` to `NULL`
> > when getting an unused slot, so even if there is a left-over dangling
> > pointer, it is not actually used, ever.
> >
> > But we need something to pacify GCC. Let's look at your patch.
> >
> > The first thing to note is that this is not _quite_ thread-safe: between
>
> Does this part of the code ever run multi-threaded?
It calls into cURL, which I suspect has a multi-threaded mode of
operation, and we do use some callbacks in `http-walker.c` and I was
worried that these callbacks could be called via cURL calls. That's why I
am concerned about thread-safety. I have looked for a while and not found
any way that code in `http.c` or `http-walker.c` could set `finished` by
way of a cURL callback, but there is a lot of code there and I could have
missed something crucial.
> > If that analysis is correct, I would expect the correct solution to turn
> > `finished` into an attribute of the slot, and change its role to be a flag
> > that this slot is spoken for and cannot be re-used quite yet even if it is
> > not currently in use.
>
> I have a feeling that we've mentioned that at least twice (perhaps
> three times) in the recent past that it is in essense reverting what
> the "finished" change baa7b67d (HTTP slot reuse fixes, 2006-03-10)
> did. We used to use the in-use bit of the slot as an indicator that
> the slot dispatched by run_active_slot() has finished (i.e. the
> in-use bit must be cleared when the request held in the struct is
> fully done), but that broke when a slot we are looking at in
> run_active_slot() is serviced (which makes in_use false), and then
> another request reuses the slot (now no longer in_use), before the
> control comes back to the loop. "while (slot->in_use)" at the
> beginning of the loop was still true, but the original request the
> slot was being used for, the one that the run_active_slot() function
> cares about, has completed.
>
> So...
No, I suggested to replace the `finished` variable with an attribute (or
"field" or "member variable") of the slot, and to respect it when looking
for an unused slot, i.e. not only look for a slot whose `in_use` is 0 but
also require `reserved_for_use` to be 0. In essence, the
`run_active_slot()` function owns the slot, even if it is not marked as
`in_use`. That should address the same concern as baa7b67d but without
using a pointer to a local variable.
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 18:04 [PATCH 0/2] quell a few gcc warnings Michael J Gruber
2022-05-06 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] dir.c: avoid gcc warning Michael J Gruber
2022-05-06 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-09 15:58 ` Taylor Blau
2022-05-07 6:14 ` Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
2022-05-06 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] http.c: " Michael J Gruber
2022-05-06 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-06 21:17 ` [PATCH] http.c: clear the 'finished' member once we are done with it Junio C Hamano
2022-05-07 5:40 ` Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
2022-05-07 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-07 19:11 ` Carlo Arenas
2022-05-23 21:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-23 22:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-23 23:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-23 23:41 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2022-05-24 0:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-24 6:31 ` Daniel Stenberg
2022-05-24 10:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-24 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-26 14:15 ` Daniel Stenberg
2022-05-24 11:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-24 17:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-24 20:16 ` Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
2022-05-24 20:45 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-24 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-25 9:08 ` Michael J Gruber
2022-05-25 13:27 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-24 22:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-24 23:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-25 2:02 ` Carlo Arenas
2022-05-24 20:38 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-24 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-25 10:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-25 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-06 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] http.c: avoid gcc warning Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
2022-05-09 11:22 ` [PATCH] detect-compiler: make detection independent of locale Michael J Gruber
2022-05-09 15:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-09 15:59 ` rsbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2205240124280.352@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@grubix.eu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).