Hi Randall and Ævar,

On Tue, 17 May 2022, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:

> On May 17, 2022 11:03 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> >On Tue, May 10 2022, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> >
> >> Over the course of the years, we developed a sub-command that gathers
> >> diagnostic data into a .zip file that can then be attached to bug
> >> reports. This sub-command turned out to be very useful in helping
> >> Scalar developers identify and fix issues.
> >
> >I don't mind this as some intermediate step, but re the context of the
> >plan for scalar "eventually going away" (discussed in previous threads)
> >I wonder why (especially re the earlier thread upthread at [1]) this
> >isn't being added to "git bugreport".
> >
> >Is the plan to integrate this into "git bugreport" eventually?

Potentially a variation of the `scalar diagnose` code could be useful in
`git bugreport`, opt-in via a new option.

But that's not the purpose of this patch series.

> Could this also not be useful in fsck, as --diagnose? That's the go-to
> command when there are issues for many users.

I can see where you're coming from, but `fsck`'s mission is to verify the
integrity of the local Git database. That is very different from the
mission of `scalar diagnose`, which is to help diagnose issues (whether
they are truly bugs or usage patterns causing unfortunate performance).

Ciao,
Dscho