From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,LIST_MIRROR_RECEIVED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348F81F670 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234981AbiBXPsC (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:48:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236496AbiBXPsA (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:48:00 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B814757A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:47:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1645717639; bh=9UdGxRoqXENd3yW1INWGBv2ym8Q8lRv3W3i+ZKCSldE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=QucY+2hfXJJtamH+nqpEH4U/C3o/hAC7rPlmIW/C6WAT0HHIxXEnMk325/aDCh9oI iSVgkMMEVXWMHZa8C8TQ7LWMuOINOyeniKoSlGz1IUcBIyxZsa4QmNqtQIQH3QJZJQ yRqCwbbV9M/U7jfUtiiWc0+0DkkCzRzzQ7xYUrFI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [172.28.129.168] ([89.1.212.236]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N4hzj-1oKq0m1JNH-011lWp; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:47:19 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:47:17 +0100 (CET) From: Johannes Schindelin X-X-Sender: virtualbox@gitforwindows.org To: Junio C Hamano cc: Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Bagas Sanjaya , =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=86var_Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0_Bjarmason?= , Jeff Hostetler , Eric Sunshine , Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/30] Builtin FSMonitor Part 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cZ2SdHIPApdLWrqc0ywwz2QMw0q2g63fCIYOF8Pv7Fme8cxHpdM ZIp2WwMRo5/UMvq3tu3TR5Ca27HfRoQTUQi7eN/AsJPds6fykuqQ1r5KI/6SSKdffGekra+ drKIV4Grwh6cmx55yzY8F6GtzLTSJ6VJA8xLBnqEqNsgMOewlb5f9YtS1CInVlrcTqlUrXE qnZT9ubfKSNaKIVlJVcLA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:3BSzyV6LNOU=:/ntF64iX/H9BE2DFXdq+Qi QzHVyeyVYavoKzDcUWj/mCC47P3VVxMvsiUxmDXoHGTSwndBtRRDpJZQj5IKYBKlha0gf27fT I1yMeFphKNJjpp0waBTFRn8Xeaf/7hUNlb5yL9DFCWgWIKRfvpN93s6lacWux6RvtJ7pCyY1f V65NSjnjS0C1dBid7b1xZeuoGFom0TpI7LFf0JteYbtX5C7/THVLDv9h/rqVTsHVM8F6mZulN DrBFxWd5rNq0IUpunDHNVFz6ABciVt95nFDAL5clqYDywTmV5abwXF7VsoK2wz7BysnDPssv8 oohOAFHxVu/Lv+pO2OsL/ktS3yzmkSmN0DXkKkzaMLah5co0IimPurqTTR1/QZGXMflS51jtl HGNOqG7bnbWbNQ1je/Ehx8mQm4zG86SkYx/5uL0KP1WUb9cRerwBteEwZylfcaU/eNvnTwgFq O2RpNci7HaEPTzzRGQ9LmZC/Wafr4gcmlrq22GGcfnpIv02aMSgvhr+H3ashGRqkqXg8HIMp+ l1lPhzroQDfIwoCImsCvPw5AGGGFzPuxWF+54RiiSqenluSKCOJRnDVqzW51bXjJ/wcwi62TA Kqu2PPjhoi+1X3ojL2xNL/YdcOaW1/GT/o7NtY/TOAP7ZzlPB4CxAOL6+fh3XZuxJ18tmEnJe 3dYgjU/GGABh03QvFOTEbOd9ZYEtt4Z1LW358PJYB1kmlAtkC3gwW/p+1skD72hMTNK90qg2m jk0gmAKEKjp30r8H5qTwAAFZMVgAfTHBw3Avhl72okeq7AwlunFm0K+XyG6j1z9Oc1Lqi+ja2 fnIy8TevDfOzlztDMNw5orYORC//DH5vY0GqF/9h0zrjx/yw2+vJ1ne484c7CLXiFrCN5ryCi dsysyEFfiwZy6kXDOHLvJqnKy9TLfB0Erzf+W10IOT4DdLrUJOF2ggosCC8/vFDlGA4hKex/U JU4QRL6t7I8XgdEsYj20x/YmUFkjUk51JRoPVY68Qx9phg2NsGS6A8kBCVOOeooAcvELmPTu4 cVnmHpjiIKGa2ek3KWE/hc9IMCgoEFqWgGOLKjRHwHokB7IS5vmTFAs6rZ4aM78NZ4e/QYjIa 2Ja6sM7/pGfKz4= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Junio, On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > >> In this version I removed the core.useBuiltinFSMonitor config setting= and > >> instead extended the existing core.fsmonitor. > > > > I am somewhat surprised that a reviewer suggested this, as it breaks t= he > > common paradigm we use to allow using several Git versions on the same > > worktree. > > I do not think sharing the same repository with different versions > of Git was considered as a possible source of problems during the > review discussion. > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/74282d08-aaeb-0a1e-cad3-1de17d59b4d1@jeffhos= tetler.com/ > > I am not saying that we should not consider it; I am just stating > the fact that there was nobody who raised as a potential issue > during the discussion that lead to the cited message. Just to make sure: I did not intend to insult anyone (and in hindsight I wish that I had made that clearer). Ciao, Dscho