Hi Ævar,

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 20 2022, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> >>
> >> > I notice that you did not take this into `seen` yet. I find that a little
> >> > sad because it would potentially have helped others to figure out the
> >> > failure in the latest `seen`:
> >> > https://github.com/git/git/runs/5255378056?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:162
> >> >
> >> > Essentially, a recent patch introduces hard-coded SHA-1 hashes in t3007.3.
> >>
> >> I saw the thread, I saw a few patches were commented on, and a few
> >> were left unanswered, but one was replied by the original submitter
> >> with a "Good catch!", making me expect the topic to be discussed or
> >> rerolled to become ready relatively soon.
> >
> > Yes, I have local changes, but I had really hoped that this patch series
> > would get a chance to prove its point by example, i.e. by offering the
> > improved output for the failures in `seen`. I hoped that because I think
> > that those improvements speak for themselves when you see them.
>
> I think it's a good idea to get wider expose in "seen", "next" etc. for
> topics where the bottleneck is lack of feedback due to lack of wider
> exposure.

Having this in `seen` will give the patch series a chance to show in real
life how it improves the process of analyzing regressions.

Ciao,
Johannes