From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,LIST_MIRROR_RECEIVED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167AF1F670 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 15:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239429AbiBTP0K (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Feb 2022 10:26:10 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:41554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237861AbiBTP0J (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Feb 2022 10:26:09 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F20CB4D60F for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 07:25:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1645370741; bh=FYoM/mE1kr2+lwgG/1yhxy4/NTrXLGZ2dXvJf8G1xoM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=EVf8UVUk/aeaU+42ONmLrTdkfMmXfJl58ZyBqdHVCgK8+lXsVy3ayvRfQJT0mIJJ7 XIOvGE65JR39Duxm+nbX61xMJib/Co5YQ8Y0LO6WS5KOxeuC4oqKDtw7oQ479LbYS1 3R/uwVCVmv92cWsQdG9OSW6IAKeE7e/viG/s2xe8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [172.28.129.168] ([89.1.212.236]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N3KTo-1oKxU71HRS-010Ppt; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:25:41 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:25:42 +0100 (CET) From: Johannes Schindelin X-X-Sender: virtualbox@gitforwindows.org To: Junio C Hamano cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:5FEimhmo28590Og6xVPR19jWiaSkS2g6tZf4jtozcBgRvNgMyfK E4ELgwzYXzTbb8EfynK6ukAqqhuXwCa9ierZX504kcneUTLOGWwViD1QiXT5WXduvEdcjCr cVNmExzUTKSlM9yEs5BhCWCXgm4tO3OIO32ZDvaqWxjhlRju/C4wQ+RGC9o4XDWH5WL5QvD 75Vw/DoIqnQ4cKwLZKbUw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:hWnjH/vPmrs=:eNpu4NXdi2Up7c4JGgu6Q2 y9SdSmD51XzVWA/aOThHWWBuE5AiTMVVWwvFuP0cwOb1A+gfz8RJVw7ntrYjBK9RixEAF/RT+ 7FcUqcRyQV7M+Yk09dWFNBI3qYdTUsL2kJB8oz/Hme9yN0Z85HY88NOQBdrSfUP6ai+nF+D+L 1oqcH9lJerlI2ANu8AGtdoVdE/gJ7PFklwGmXeLjBtbZYNUFK0gtIFJ5BqybK76HK5Ks4qlBa b6LVpbnGxEEsUGnfwLXCJuRHHBbFfKfJ9ifFHPw+II0Middg9TA3hpZOruyQeWyIuONqSRRQA Z6cxyC+P6cHi3PM0o969h+q0phs7z/FY8fBACzbblbB6A3hHCcbMTWAFS6CAcNTKzvH2WY63P GYhDdaKs9F2Ih++qwKYJrbY5uo5x4Pe3I6GKvnSL/hzsPs7f96jSOx+qorEzuol9/S2eeuxc1 tTbU0dMq61cQNz0dg1eQ3Lxl4r1jEQXycB4SxyzEJx/hS87bKh9wixsX+NUllRv93UHLstgtk ekuJL6/tcrQ229Q+YftvUALdzmqzlWEE4M53I010MXvxYzF+/zEIdgnyZS4Hy3mFpkaIGJ5vI giEmbLh/DDrXGwfitGGZMqhx5qpRk5T+Yhma99ZcP1JuMW6jdUB6mvw0GHQ46jcUGQn+Jx257 MMVwzYNkgv6g2G4en/rsuoBwJ+gKAgfJX38n4s1zc8792cV/R4j6hQ5Mj0qrIzbgmPsm2e/lx 47jjC4HMCTcsfwOaEaeL7j/A+G0oU8VB2odWOQzBut23Oq2pNV7H9jTURCcKmGSWyY8zo0tP4 LR1jakSmLZkKjUPLX5mz00vgCZx8ryA5JMam5N2aXourUAwUcYfxLwTsmroY7hHCBenGehf1l Xx6c/VvRy67Qq/b1IQYWauVn3yF3l5ShUfLU3Ar9Wl5XD6G1fBYJ5cw4+VUhHExLp39kRf+yr eSIw0XXpfGFY+eNR8asAUrU0U3J6fFu1OFpYnWDU915r+oJY/jAo/FcpHq279XdBT+g4AYlXi T838BGx52niCsuTsWXhzHvVhbl/MsjSqJyYb2Wpx4gTxTvdp4WuZNmqth52MB08U3/VSpqSK7 Um54emrUN1l/Jw= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Junio, On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > I notice that you did not take this into `seen` yet. I find that a lit= tle > > sad because it would potentially have helped others to figure out the > > failure in the latest `seen`: > > https://github.com/git/git/runs/5255378056?check_suite_focus=3Dtrue#st= ep:5:162 > > > > Essentially, a recent patch introduces hard-coded SHA-1 hashes in t300= 7.3. > > I saw the thread, I saw a few patches were commented on, and a few > were left unanswered, but one was replied by the original submitter > with a "Good catch!", making me expect the topic to be discussed or > rerolled to become ready relatively soon. Yes, I have local changes, but I had really hoped that this patch series would get a chance to prove its point by example, i.e. by offering the improved output for the failures in `seen`. I hoped that because I think that those improvements speak for themselves when you see them. Ciao, Dscho