From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Samuel Čavoj" <samuel@cavoj.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sequencer: fix gpg option passed to octopus merge
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:55:42 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2010122239430.50@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy2kbns5l.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1790 bytes --]
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Samuel Čavoj <samuel@cavoj.net> writes:
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] sequencer: fix gpg option passed to octopus merge
>
> Puzzling. Why do you single out octopus merge like this?
>
> sequencer.c::do_merge() is called from pick_commits() whenever we
> see a "merge" insn, and not limited to an octopus merge.
>
> Can we have a test to demonstrate the existing failure, so that we
> can notice if this fix is broken in the future?
Yes, now that I understand that not only octopus merges are affected, I
would be very much in favor of adding a test case.
If I may suggest to add a new test case to t3435 based on t3430's
'--rebase-merges with strategies' and t3404's 'rebase -i
--gpg-sign=<key-id>'? Something along these lines:
-- snipsnap --
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 00acb124962..88ccff4838d 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -3677,7 +3677,7 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r,
strvec_push(&cmd.args, "-F");
strvec_push(&cmd.args, git_path_merge_msg(r));
if (opts->gpg_sign)
- strvec_push(&cmd.args, opts->gpg_sign);
+ strvec_pushf(&cmd.args, "-S%s", opts->gpg_sign);
/* Add the tips to be merged */
for (j = to_merge; j; j = j->next)
diff --git a/t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh b/t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh
index b47c59c190b..f70b280f5c1 100755
--- a/t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh
+++ b/t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh
@@ -68,4 +68,10 @@ test_expect_failure 'rebase -p --no-gpg-sign override commit.gpgsign' '
test_must_fail git verify-commit HEAD
'
+test_expect_success 'rebase -r, GPG and merge strategies' '
+ git reset --hard merged &&
+ git rebase -fr --gpg-sign -s resolve --root &&
+ git verify-commit HEAD
+'
+
test_done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-11 22:48 [PATCH] sequencer: fix gpg option passed to octopus merge Samuel Čavoj
2020-10-11 22:58 ` brian m. carlson
2020-10-12 10:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-10-12 13:15 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-12 16:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-12 19:26 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-12 19:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-12 20:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-12 19:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-12 20:55 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2020-10-13 4:45 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2010122239430.50@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=samuel@cavoj.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).