Hi,

On Fri, 15 May 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>
> >> At this late stage in the cycle, would it be a safer change to
> >> revert the whole thing, I wonder, rather than piling fixes on top of
> >> fixes to the initial breakage?
> >>
> >> 303775a2 (t/test_lib: avoid naked bash arrays in file_lineno, 2020-05-07)
> >> 662f9cf1 (tests: when run in Bash, annotate test failures with file name/line number, 2020-04-11)
> >
> > will also need:
> >
> >   676eb0c1ce (ci: add a problem matcher for GitHub Actions, 2020-04-11)
>
> Yeah, I think that is a good idea.  I suspect that leaving it there
> won't cause problems, though---it would be just nothing is found to
> be clicked and that's the end of it, no?
>
> Will add a revert to the series anyway.

Yes, I'm fine with reverting this, as breaking TAP is a rather bad side
effect.

Ciao,
Dscho