Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Rewrite packfile reuse code

[Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>]

Hi Chris,

On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, Christian Couder wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 10:42 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> >
> > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> > >
> > >> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>>> It could be a good idea if Peff could answer some of the comments made
> > >>>> by Jonathan Tan about patch 9/9.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I have put Peff as the author of all the commits.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks. I think the series looks mostly good except for the questions I
> > >>> raised in patch 9/9, so I'll wait for Peff to respond too.
> > >>
> > >> Hmph, the round before this one has been in 'next' for quite a
> > >> while, so should I eject it before waiting for Peff to respond
> > >> before queuing this one?
> > >
> > > After rebasing these v3 patches on top of the base of the one in
> > > 'next', the only difference seems to be the log message of 3/9 and
> > > the contents of 9/9.  I guess I'll mark the topic as "on hold" for
> > > now before doing anything, as I am officially taking a time-off most
> > > of this week ;-)
> >
> > So..., that week has passed---anything new?
>
> Unfortunately, no.
>
> If you want I can send an incremental change on the content of 9/9 on
> top of what's in next. Otherwise I can't see what I could do on this.
>
> Peff, could you tell us if you might have time to take a look at this soon?

Chris, correct me if I am wrong, but was it not your decision to
contribute these patches? Are you saying that you do not understand them
well enough to drive this patch series forward (e.g. address all reviews
and questions) and are basically trying to force Peff to contribute them
instead?

Ciao,
Johannes