From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mingw: allow building with an MSYS2 runtime v3.x
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:32:37 +0100 (STD) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1903111727510.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr2bfmt5z.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> writes:
>
> > So let's invert that test case to test for *anything else* than a
> > version starting with "1" (for MSys). That should safeguard us for the
> > future, even if Cygwin ends up releasing versionsl like 314.272.65536.
>
> An obvious alternative is to do "2" -> "[23]" *and* update the else to
> an explicit check for "1", *and* add an else that fails the build when
> it sees "4" and other unknown ones.
Right.
> I do not know how compatible MSYS2 runtime v4.x will be with the
> settings the part inside the ifneq() we see here protects, but you
> probably do, so I think this would be good enough.
I would expect Cygwin v4.x (which will be the basis for MSYS2 runtime
v4.x) to be as diligent as Cygwin v3.x in maintaining as much backwards
compatibility as possible.
Read: I trust "2 or higher" to be the answer.
> The only case that makes any difference is when v4.x _mostly_ satisifies
> but slightly differs, affecting the built binary in a subtle way that is
> not discovered right away. But in such a case, the more cautious "fail
> on '4' that we do not recognize" will not help much, as the first
> reaction after seeing the error would be to copy the settings that used
> to be OK with v2.x and v3.x anyway (which is what is being done
> here---we start with the assumption that the support needed for v3.x is
> largely the same as v2.x).
>
> Will queue directly on top of... 'maint'? 'master'?
>
> Let's say 'maint' and merge that up to 'master'.
Thank you.
For the record, the really super ugly hack I plan on implementing to make
Windows builds pass in our Azure Pipeline is to build the
git-sdk-64-minimal artifact (which contains all of the stuff needed to
compile Git for Windows, such as `make`, `gcc`, etc) is to "install" a
different `uname`: as the MINGW binaries live in `/mingw64/bin/` (unlike
the MSYS binaries, which live in `/usr/bin/`, like `uname.exe`), I can
write the following script into `/mingw64/bin/uname`:
#!/bin/sh
case "$*" in -r) echo 2.bogus;; *) /usr/bin/uname "$*";; esac
This will be the stop-gap solution for branches that are based on commits
*without* this here patch.
It's ugly alright, but the only hack I could think of that actually will
work.
Ciao,
Dscho
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > config.mak.uname | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/config.mak.uname b/config.mak.uname
> > index c8b0e34c31..0207e895a4 100644
> > --- a/config.mak.uname
> > +++ b/config.mak.uname
> > @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ ifneq (,$(wildcard ../THIS_IS_MSYSGIT))
> > NO_GETTEXT = YesPlease
> > COMPAT_CLFAGS += -D__USE_MINGW_ACCESS
> > else
> > - ifeq ($(shell expr "$(uname_R)" : '2\.'),2)
> > + ifneq ($(shell expr "$(uname_R)" : '1\.'),2)
> > # MSys2
> > prefix = /usr/
> > ifeq (MINGW32,$(MSYSTEM))
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-08 15:51 [PATCH 0/1] mingw: fix uname -r test Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-03-08 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] mingw: allow building with an MSYS2 runtime v3.x Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2019-03-10 1:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-11 16:32 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1903111727510.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).