From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Pratik Karki <predatoramigo@gmail.com>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Reimplement rebase --merge via interactive machinery
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:22:36 +0100 (STD) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1901181519230.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1901181434520.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Hi Elijah,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> > Dscho: Looks like our series conflicts slightly. Would you like me to
> > rebase mine on top of yours and squash the following change into
> > commit c91c944a068e ("rebase: define linearization ordering and
> > enforce it", 2018-12-11), or do you want to rebase your series on mine
> > and either make a new commit out of this change or squash it in
> > somewhere?
> >
> > diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> > index 0317280f83..54023547ff 100644
> > --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> > +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> > @@ -578,7 +578,8 @@ static int run_am(struct rebase_options *opts)
> > argv_array_pushl(&format_patch.args, "format-patch", "-k", "--stdout",
> > "--full-index", "--cherry-pick", "--right-only",
> > "--src-prefix=a/", "--dst-prefix=b/", "--no-renames",
> > - "--no-cover-letter", "--pretty=mboxrd", NULL);
> > + "--no-cover-letter", "--pretty=mboxrd",
> > + "--topo-order", NULL);
> > if (opts->git_format_patch_opt.len)
> > argv_array_split(&format_patch.args,
> > opts->git_format_patch_opt.buf);
>
> I can easily squash that in.
Actually, I take that back. This is tested-for in the regression test
suite, and I need to keep the built-in and the scripted rebase in sync for
that test suite to pass, so that single-liner would incur more changes
than I am comfortable with adopting into the builtin-rebase--am patch
series...
I am about to submit a new iteration of my patch series, would it be too
much trouble for you to rebase on top? If it would be, let me know, then I
will rebase on top of yours.
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-18 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 6:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] Reimplement rebase --merge via interactive machinery Elijah Newren
2018-11-08 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the " Elijah Newren
2018-11-12 15:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-08 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rebase: Implement --merge via git-rebase--interactive Elijah Newren
2018-11-12 16:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-12 18:21 ` Phillip Wood
2018-11-13 9:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-14 23:06 ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-13 16:06 ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-14 23:03 ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-15 12:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Reimplement rebase --merge via interactive machinery Elijah Newren
2018-11-22 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] " Elijah Newren
2018-11-22 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] rebase: fix incompatible options error message Elijah Newren
2018-11-28 8:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-11-28 15:58 ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-28 16:12 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-11-28 16:31 ` Elijah Newren
2018-11-22 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] t5407: add a test demonstrating how interactive handles --skip differently Elijah Newren
2018-11-22 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] am, rebase--merge: do not overlook --skip'ed commits with post-rewrite Elijah Newren
2018-11-22 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery Elijah Newren
2018-11-22 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] git-legacy-rebase: simplify unnecessary triply-nested if Elijah Newren
2018-11-22 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] rebase: define linearization ordering and enforce it Elijah Newren
2018-11-22 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] rebase: Implement --merge via the interactive machinery Elijah Newren
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Reimplement rebase --merge via " Elijah Newren
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] rebase: make builtin and legacy script error messages the same Elijah Newren
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] rebase: fix incompatible options error message Elijah Newren
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] t5407: add a test demonstrating how interactive handles --skip differently Elijah Newren
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] am, rebase--merge: do not overlook --skip'ed commits with post-rewrite Elijah Newren
2019-01-21 16:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-21 17:59 ` Elijah Newren
2019-01-21 18:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery Elijah Newren
2019-01-21 16:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-21 17:50 ` Elijah Newren
2019-01-21 18:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-21 18:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-22 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-02-20 11:00 ` Phillip Wood
2019-02-21 17:44 ` Elijah Newren
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] git-legacy-rebase: simplify unnecessary triply-nested if Elijah Newren
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] rebase: define linearization ordering and enforce it Elijah Newren
2018-12-11 16:11 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] rebase: Implement --merge via the interactive machinery Elijah Newren
2019-01-07 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Reimplement rebase --merge via " Elijah Newren
2019-01-07 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-07 20:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-07 20:39 ` Elijah Newren
2019-01-11 18:36 ` Elijah Newren
2019-01-18 13:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-18 14:22 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2019-01-18 17:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-18 18:07 ` Elijah Newren
2019-01-18 21:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-18 21:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-21 21:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-21 16:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-21 21:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-21 21:04 ` Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 " Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] rebase: make builtin and legacy script error messages the same Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] rebase: fix incompatible options error message Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] t5407: add a test demonstrating how interactive handles --skip differently Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] am, rebase--merge: do not overlook --skip'ed commits with post-rewrite Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] git-legacy-rebase: simplify unnecessary triply-nested if Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] rebase: define linearization ordering and enforce it Elijah Newren
2019-01-29 1:39 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] rebase: implement --merge via the interactive machinery Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1901181519230.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@talktalk.net \
--cc=predatoramigo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).