From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B37B1F453 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726406AbeJZRNY (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:13:24 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:33129 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726014AbeJZRNY (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:13:24 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.129] ([37.201.193.149]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZ8fw-1g1bcw3zxc-00KxTU; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:37:11 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.129] ([37.201.193.149]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZ8fw-1g1bcw3zxc-00KxTU; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:37:11 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:37:16 +0200 (DST) From: Johannes Schindelin X-X-Sender: virtualbox@gitforwindows.org To: Junio C Hamano cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Offer to run CI/PR builds in Azure Pipelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:idgkV8p56cieShNbASL8u39gq6896PGiOjPdKw0ayzd6kHD35l7 fs259aiJ7R5RWqUfVyKd7dmBNyU6NkDNyddL2DXjbFQIPCHj4P69u1d7+BF0L1pcuHRRuLi Ebi6joHR3ZtbqyumDP1/R/DYWgFhvkyU60+qO1QXZTFpJvvbFG6ruXO6vJR5xmTYVvcTj23 z+crQk4pq+si+xjnrQtjw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:MbU+hb1/BZM=:sBMQowBRZJ4o+wroppnpp8 n+4+ghSaINFHgQJCoYsfJcBOv9baS34QltbdItX9dZYnzWOVPPUduEZ1sDK6D9Q2vqVy63KFf 9PV5zuYkvEmJ9mgDU5GnKhkuwzaSwpK7Vdm6/a235N+7Cm6/SqZ2UfhxIyk5JbczwpAQ28EiK fhr9ir5oRId7PfpOrARQug15aHPRQFaP37kZ1SnLeUU26Hmob8zsgPPhJyUjzlJqamaUZ6/Z+ NBccpORq2OFxIgLlwbRSi1VnlOOlj+2fYRcPs5gU7f28Sdh6c8f62EBkOf9zIi+DIuwcftF13 bVLrbEPeFVfZPsOp3Lp3D7yvyyUDZO/QxRw4PR6MeZzhgnr3ubnbIMe+15xogUBggk9XY1clw i8j5d/bAoyJ5sjMkyAu/hXnWQs5y3kWvUruf7CyFwbk2RqxKB+lYXkNF7PoplsIoOMevxrRQk qpgZImiHseA9BuOmMV5nkBjSp/V+JBjYeFPsnfUgp2s1wjkoJOs4HZrMG1WXzIhcOoMI5Gnr1 Oun0qMC0p2v672R+k+b2PtI3BiXMl7dMdYaXZ5vBgRvozvP88trnm39lZoHDnKk5DTW+GY86d SOTU1op0ydT7iovGcgaVAGnnaAiK4hIat7gWMdxHBId37eyk5MqA0gbqPXLKWypsIvdzu3nZs qHvKIjMaav8Jbny9IVws8F0B7tmHlhsKNOD7pH/FwhW9uHQ67T1/o65KAIPx6J9FHKmuXBj7x tNhIU4Roeo3BL79jqSzdlztxsC/bb7wC5FqXASTX8GcaLIDFR0V1lzi5WRKgcSpzD3TQxJgfQ cpRODQwukdatv6Qw+9YskQ4UvSzNqvxFOIvJ7MnKvMMOqBzOxY= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Junio, On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" > writes: > > > For a long time already, we have Git's source code continuously tested via > > Travis CI, see e.g. https://travis-ci.org/git/git/builds/421738884. It has > > served us well, and more and more developers actually pay attention and > > benefit from the testing this gives us. > > What's the current status of this topic? Has the "p4 daemon gets > left behind" one resolved to everybody's satisfaction? No. I was kind of waiting for Luke's answer, and in the alternative I hoped to find some time to work on trying to reproduce his issues on my system (but I failed to find said time so far). > I think that one was the only large discussion on the series (aside from > "do we want to keep Travis?" subthread, which does not make this series > undesirable), modulo your "oy oy oy that is leftover debugging I need to > remove in a reroll". > > The topic was marked as "On hold, monitoring discussion" and it > seems that discussion has quieted down, so the next step is to see > an updated series? I really think that I have to figure out what causes those p4d issues before I can give you that updated. I *am* interested, to be sure, it's just that other things seem to get in my way all the time. One thing that keeps getting in my way, for example, is the performance issue identified in the chain linter. And I do think that I have to take this into consideration for another update to this here patch series, too, by adding `--no-chain-lint` to the Windows phase. There is a similar thing with `--with-dashes`, too. Will keep you updated, Dscho > > Thanks. > > >