From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow info
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:38:43 +0200 (DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1810241033420.4546@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1810241004440.4546@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Hi Junio,
me again. I was wrong.
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> > writes:
> >
> > > +...
> > > + d="$(git -C shallow-server rev-parse --verify D)" &&
> > > + git -C shallow-server checkout master &&
> > > +
> > > +...
> > > + ! grep $d shallow-client/.git/shallow &&
> >
> > We know D (and $d) is not a tag,
>
> Actually, it is... the `test_commit D` creates that tag, and that is what
> I use here.
>
> > but perhaps the place that assigns to $d (way above) can do the
> > rev-parse of D^0, not D, to make it more clear what is going on,
> > especially given that...
>
> ... that the `grep` really wants to test for the absence of the *commit*,
> not the *tag* in .git/shallow?
>
> Yes, you are right ;-)
>
> So why did my test do the right thing, if it looked at a tag, but did not
> dereference it via ^0? The answer is: the `test_commit` function creates
> light-weight tags, i.e. no tag objects. And therefore, the $d^0 you found
> below, that's just confusing.
What I was referring to was the call
test_must_fail git -C shallow-client rev-parse --verify $d^0
However, here we *have* to append ^0, otherwise `rev-parse --verify` will
(and quite confusingly so) *succeed*. I *repeatedly* fall into that trap
that `git rev-parse --verify 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000`
will succeed. Why? Because that is a valid 40-digit hex string. Not
because the object exists. Because it does not.
So I managed to confuse myself again into believing that I only need to
append ^0 to the earlier rev-parse call, but can remove it from this one,
when in reality, I have to append it to both. In the first case, to avoid
having to think about dereferencing a tag, in the second case, to force
rev-parse to look for the object.
Ciao,
Dscho
>
> I will change it so that the `rev-parse` call uses ^0 (even if it is
> technically not necessary), to avoid said confusion.
>
> Thanks,
> Dscho
>
> >
> > > + git -C shallow-server branch branch-orig D^0 &&
> >
> > ... this does that D^0 thing here to makes us wonder if D needs
> > unwrapping before using it as a commit (not commit-ish).
> >
> > If we did so, we could use $d here instead of D^0.
> >
> > > + git -C shallow-client fetch --prune --depth=2 \
> > > + origin "+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*"
> > > +'
> > > +
> > > . "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-httpd.sh
> > > start_httpd
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 20:18 [PATCH 0/2] repack -ad: fix after `fetch --prune` in a shallow repository Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-07-11 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow info Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-07-11 22:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commits Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-07-13 20:31 ` Jeff King
2018-07-14 21:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-07-16 17:36 ` Jeff King
2018-07-17 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-19 16:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-07-19 20:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-20 9:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-20 19:31 ` Jeff King
2018-07-17 17:28 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-17 19:41 ` Jeff King
2018-07-18 17:31 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-18 17:45 ` Jeff King
2018-07-18 17:48 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-17 16:39 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-17 16:48 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19 17:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-07-17 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] repack -ad: fix after `fetch --prune` in a shallow repository Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-07-17 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow info Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-07-17 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commits Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-07-17 17:45 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] repack -ad: fix after `fetch --prune` in a shallow repository Jeff King
2018-07-17 19:20 ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 17:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-22 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] repack -ad: fix after fetch --prune " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-22 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow info Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-24 3:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-24 8:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-24 8:38 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2018-10-22 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] shallow: offer to prune only non-existing entries Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-24 3:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-24 8:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-24 15:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-25 18:54 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-10-26 7:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-26 20:49 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-10-29 20:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-22 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commits Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-24 3:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-24 8:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] repack -ad: fix after fetch --prune in a shallow repository Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-24 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-24 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow info Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-24 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] shallow: offer to prune only non-existing entries Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-24 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commits Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1810241033420.4546@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).