From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: Please revert e371046b6473907aa6d62b7862a3afe9d33561e1 Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:47:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4FD05B45.2090006@alum.mit.edu> <7vd35bjcd6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v3967huss.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Michael Haggerty , Thomas Adam , John Wiegley , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 07 20:47:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SchkK-0001D4-0Y for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:47:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932879Ab2FGSrp (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:47:45 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:57867 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932807Ab2FGSrV (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:47:21 -0400 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3W7bMp00Hgz4KWFs; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:47:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-110-237.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.110.237]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3W7bMm2cpLz4KKBp; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:47:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id D3A94CA2A2; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:47:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: I was in EXCRUCIATING PAIN until I started reading JACK AND JILL Magazine!! In-Reply-To: <7v3967huss.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:54:27 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Andreas Schwab writes: > >> Only if the conversion is restarted from scratch. > > Yes, that was the use case I was the most worried about. > > Often a re-import is one way to validate what you have (and worse > yet, what you based your recent work on), so unmatching commit > object names are red flags. Given the notorious unreliability of cvsps that doesn't look like a very serious change in comparison. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."