From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can't find the revelant commit with git-log
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:44:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2ipxc27zi.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3EF650.20407@lsrfire.ath.cx> ("René Scharfe"'s message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:12:00 +0100")
René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:
> Am 25.01.2011 10:01, schrieb Francis Moreau:
>>
>> The project is the Linux kernel, and I'm trying to look for changes
>> which happened between v2.6.27 and v2.6.28. The changes happened in the
>> following file: drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c where a function has been
>> removed:
>>
>> $ git --version
>> git version 1.7.4.rc3
>>
>> $ cd ~/linux-2.6/drivers/pci/
>> $ git grep blacklist v2.6.27 -- drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>> $
>>
>> No ouput... hmm, I know it's in... oh maybe the path is incorrect
>>
>> $ git git grep blacklist v2.6.27 -- intel-iommu.c
>> v2.6.27:intel-iommu.c:static int blacklist_iommu(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
>> v2.6.27:intel-iommu.c: .callback = blacklist_iommu,
>>
>> ah, so Git failed previously without any comments on the wrong
>> path... maybe it should ?
>
> Good idea.
>
Actually I _think_ I encoutered this behaviour for other commands as well,
like git-show or git-log, I don't remember.
>
>> So at that point I know that in the revision v2.6.27, there's a function
>> called "blacklist_iommu" in drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>>
>> Now take a look if it's still there in v2.6.28:
>>
>> $ git git grep blacklist v2.6.28 -- intel-iommu.c
>> $
>>
>> This time nothing is printed but I know that the command is correct.
>>
>> So now I'm interested in looking for the commit which removed this
>> function. Fo this I'm trying to use git-log(1):
>>
>> $ git log --full-history --follow -S'static int blacklist_iommu(const struct dmi_system_id *id)' v2.6.27..v2.6.28 -- intel-iommu.c
>> $ echo $?
>> 0
>>
>> I tried different options but it fails.
>>
>> Also I found that passing the exact string to '-S' is annoying, are
>> there any way to just pass a part of the string such as
>> "-Sblacklist_iommu" ?
>
> This (-Sblacklist_iommu) works for me.
>
Hmm, I thought I tried this and it didn't work, but that's obviously
wrong.
>
>> Sorry if I miss the revelant git-log's option, but there're so many...
>
> Try -m (show full diff for merge commits), as the change you're looking
> for seems to have been introduced by a merge, not a regular commit.
>
> $ opts="--stat -Sblacklist_iommu -m --oneline"
> $ revs="v2.6.27..v2.6.28"
>
> $ git log $opts $revs -- drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>
> This returns nothing. Hmm. Let's try this instead:
>
> $ git log $opts $revs -- drivers/pci/
> 057316c (from 3e2dab9) Merge branch 'linus' into test
> drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 307 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
> 6b2ada8 (from 3b7ecb5) Merge branches 'core/softlockup', 'core/softirq', 'core/resources', 'core/printk' and 'core/misc' into core-v28-for-linus
> drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 187 ++++++--------------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
> d847059 (from 725c258) Merge branch 'x86/apic' into x86-v28-for-linus-phase4-B
> drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 185 ++++++---------------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 160 deletions(-)
> 725c258 (from 129d6ab) Merge branches 'core/iommu', 'x86/amd-iommu' and 'x86/iommu' into x86-v28-for-linus-phase3-B
> drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 6e03f99 (from 9821626) Merge branch 'linus' into x86/iommu
> drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> Strange, why did we need to remove the last path component to get these
> results which say that exactly the file we previously specified was changed?
ah... I think I've been hit by this, since I tried '-m' too but see
nothing and was not smart enough to remove the filename from the path.
> Also interesting, and matching the above results in that we see the need for
> the -m flag confirmed:
>
> $ for merge in 057316c 6b2ada8 d847059 725c258 6e03f99
> do
> a=$(git show $merge | grep -c blacklist_iommu)
> b=$(git show -m $merge | grep -c blacklist_iommu)
> echo $merge $a $b
> done
> 057316c 0 2
> 6b2ada8 0 2
> d847059 0 2
> 725c258 0 2
> 6e03f99 0 2
>
> IAW: the combined diff for the five found merges doesn't show any changes to
> a line containing the string "blacklist_iommu", but the full diffs do.
>
> Let's check for the presence of the string in the merge results and their
> parents:
>
> $ for merge in 057316c 6b2ada8 d847059 725c258 6e03f99
> do
> for rev in $(git show $merge | grep ^Merge:)
> do
> t=parent
> case $rev in
> Merge:)
> echo
> rev=$merge
> t=merge
> ;;
> esac
> if git grep -q blacklist_iommu $rev -- drivers/pci/
> then
> echo "$t $rev: found"
> else
> echo "$t $rev: not found"
> fi
> done
> done
>
> merge 057316c: not found
> parent 3e2dab9: found
> parent 2515ddc: not found
>
> merge 6b2ada8: not found
> parent 278429c: not found
> parent 3b7ecb5: found
> parent 77af7e3: not found
> parent 1516071: not found
> parent 1fa63a8: not found
> parent 8546232: not found
>
> merge d847059: not found
> parent 725c258: found
> parent 11494547: not found
>
> merge 725c258: found
> parent 3dd392a: found
> parent 72d3105: found
> parent 129d6ab: not found
> parent 1e19b16: found
>
> merge 6e03f99: found
> parent 9821626: not found
> parent 6bfb09a: found
>
> Hmm, seems like the function is gone since d847059. Does all of this help
> you in any way?
Yes it does, but one question I'm wondering is: is it possible to do
this more user friendly ? ;)
Thanks
--
Francis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 9:01 Can't find the revelant commit with git-log Francis Moreau
2011-01-25 16:12 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-25 17:44 ` Francis Moreau [this message]
2011-01-26 8:36 ` Francis Moreau
2011-01-26 10:44 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-01-26 20:56 ` Francis Moreau
2011-01-26 21:03 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-01-26 21:08 ` Francis Moreau
2011-01-26 21:14 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-01-26 21:31 ` Francis Moreau
2011-01-26 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-26 21:32 ` Francis Moreau
2011-01-26 18:11 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-28 20:29 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-29 0:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-29 2:34 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-29 5:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-29 20:26 ` René Scharfe
2011-02-01 21:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 22:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-10 18:50 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-29 20:26 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-28 22:01 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-29 12:52 ` Francis Moreau
2011-01-29 13:02 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-29 13:57 ` Francis Moreau
2011-01-29 15:17 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-26 9:01 ` Francis Moreau
2011-01-26 18:39 ` René Scharfe
2011-01-26 19:50 ` Francis Moreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2ipxc27zi.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).