From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: I want to release a "git-1.0" Date: 31 May 2005 07:45:33 -0600 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 31 15:50:09 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dd781-0002eu-4T for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 15:49:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261760AbVEaNwb (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 09:52:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261876AbVEaNwb (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 09:52:31 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:6310 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261760AbVEaNw3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 09:52:29 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j4VDkY9N032142; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:46:35 -0600 Received: (from eric@localhost) by ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j4VDjZGU032133; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:45:35 -0600 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > Ok, I'm at the point where I really think it's getting close to a 1.0, and > make another tar-ball etc. I obviously feel that it's already way superior > to CVS, but I also realize that somebody who is used to CVS may not > actually realize that very easily. I way behind the power curve on learning git at this point but one piece of the puzzle that CVS has that I don't believe git does are multiple people committing to the same repository, especially remotely. I don't see that as a down side of git but it is a common way people CVS so it is worth documenting. Eric