From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1374561800-938-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 23 11:33:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V1YyD-0008CL-Gq for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:33:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756124Ab3GWJdV convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 05:33:21 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49258 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755728Ab3GWJdU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 05:33:20 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Yy7-00083F-2d for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:33:19 +0200 Received: from eim39.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl ([83.21.128.39]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:33:19 +0200 Received: from jnareb by eim39.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:33:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 83.21.128.39 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/25.0.1364.160 Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano pobox.com> writes: >=20 > This is mostly unchanged since the previous round, except that >=20 > * The option is spelled "--force-with-lease=3D:". > Nobody liked "cas" as it was too technical, many disliked > "lockref" because "lock" sounded as if push by others were > excluded by it while in fact this is to fail us. Perhaps "--force-gently" ? :-) --=20 Jakub Nar=C4=99bski