From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1461F953 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240678AbhLURvz (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:51:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37272 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231318AbhLURvz (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:51:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x104a.google.com (mail-pj1-x104a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::104a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1856C061574 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:51:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x104a.google.com with SMTP id x18-20020a17090a789200b001a7317f995cso2108819pjk.4 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:51:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Oze0W6hFU08fPav755yArEMa8FwAsKVZZoufxNAtr5o=; b=fTtOrjR8AGLYuyfhl/Tu5ACVZwNm2YucMc3HrfejDcjjTCDSvkP5UAlBtcvUayn9/v +tedpb68y/avQzzIVMM8YbgqrWdD6igVWaAh2QqFVsaAEpt8B8bsmwSlzDIaGRTxGZwx Ml+VLJ3VIuku4TkFaCuDnPPMtK3c4sLPWEvE7rENtuFuCR/ewxI8teO/i6LDPomTOpRK 3spr/U8ma5uhN80vNB00WBM97UunNWmvxpz7hxG179d934Z6nVF8mZQAwAysvLr1tLl+ pFjI6HCuXqj6og0BhzKqwMy9ZdDtBuD7WAUCzHvCwNY7gESzdMT+o9+5oizVmsj44OUI fo7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Oze0W6hFU08fPav755yArEMa8FwAsKVZZoufxNAtr5o=; b=Relj2qQN0xEMojr4rK49Pxazp9sjKwUJGz/9uRmi7tZaVessc9JlFBzAK4uqrwpTUf eVxYPVHGjJJ/rsQiTCwxXhIX4neuCdhMinP74gBXjQIkKKJe1HFDD1Q6hZfBNyMHnp+g smIRqBObgQWzZUlhZs3Ro19I3lr4MAn+3O05noY+CbJzV7gahGdy2SG0mRmA9N3xqQO+ U0PvmfSBwBLOoRh1NQO+n6MoOjSRRFex/R5DM3cXnYat0nfE8Sl4lmIAlYWewZflpjPf Dy30ftEq9Yt5C0Ms18GhbiKKM2RssGOJlykF2O8ZYzpYHWxUUg5iNKqUGchl164GtNGv lQYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lNMhUn0+CNEKk2syWb5xLOYjdnIUU24qOMqTpmTmN3RMIvhgE gk6qoBH5OhUhLpyAz3ppsAxJfrVyk+yjEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyF4SNfW4OVhJjNN1ZUGBsxqrfCfZg85fvTiVhpHQrj56+43rLExdn0UvUppbalrrWDGnkemMFTSDNOdA== X-Received: from chooglen.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:24:72f4:c0a8:26d9]) (user=chooglen job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:8e85:b0:142:7621:e3b3 with SMTP id bg5-20020a1709028e8500b001427621e3b3mr4248210plb.84.1640109114314; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:51:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:51:52 -0800 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20211216233324.65126-1-chooglen@google.com> <20211220233459.45739-1-chooglen@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] implement branch --recurse-submodules From: Glen Choo To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Tan , Josh Steadmon , Emily Shaffer , "=?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason" , Philippe Blain Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Glen Choo writes: > >> v6 fixes v5's bad rebase; it was based off a merge commit in 'seen' >> instead of js/branch-track-inherit. Since v5 is mostly a no-op, I will >> also include a range-diff against v4, which is the last version that >> anyone except Junio would care about. >> >> This version is based off Josh's js/branch-track-inherit v7. Because that >> is not yet in 'seen',... > > Thanks. js/branch/track-inherit has been using v7 since Fri Dec 17 > 15:47:47 2021 -0800, but unfortunately that was after the week's > integration work and the 'seen' shown to the public probably did not > have it. > > FYI at least since [*1*] was used to create 751363af (branch: add > flags and config to inherit tracking, 2021-10-16), the topic > js/branch-track-inherit has always been queued on top of f443b226 > (Thirteenth batch, 2021-10-14). I try to keep the same base to keep > things stable, unless there is a strong enough reason why we should > depend on newer base commit. Ah, I see, so it would make the most sense for me to apply the patches on the the same base as you. I'll keep that in mind in the future.