From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA61F51E for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 22:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="U5RGYHFZ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232179AbiI0WCJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:02:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42752 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231897AbiI0WCG (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:02:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x54a.google.com (mail-pg1-x54a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::54a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6EC161CFC for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x54a.google.com with SMTP id r7-20020a632047000000b00439d0709849so6427556pgm.22 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=w/Uu3kevqcuYK6OeYNtAz9bIAFOAKNk5xCLcMRQQgVs=; b=U5RGYHFZYgHDelg7T0B1Wc4Nx3tqtutd/54xmRsDkJ6Nvd1GzA+oH5wM5uZtTGuY8e qXhU9kXq/7Zn7R+CqsSNX0WdEzzxPDBkrOGaVEbNGIesjF6ZDirpVu+aHRS/jUorsvl2 G3/uFdWIKo37GK+aH8An8q1Su9U5fzB0+7CM+Mw9P5VNS+x3G+3zNC+070Hzb7NDA73b l9S+swSt1wK1l/PHUQYVu6HyPHPn6Wh/aOGc9m1O0CcRguJNP3CyYi1zhhkmLmwfsQiP sAud73DU1REuezWXzRg0MbyeUkHsSIgPvXv61e0HRYWgKdtWok7kbBgqzgJNB5jnJaJB eTww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=w/Uu3kevqcuYK6OeYNtAz9bIAFOAKNk5xCLcMRQQgVs=; b=GvS3JMb50pVbvd9yOLfJMfvNi7SawrP5p7hbA29C+bgIlaBeiY6Vo+9Q+KsNkU5pTW Z5O5Ctm4GPVT8Zn80fNaOeHw9ng+E3bg+N6cOtHuHXZDOfeiFAO6y4JXI0Y05eAhdOYD vv1L5Hw02AxKgPWFYwHAgHtEkIcEzG7x6ZnLBozPR78EEvr1HOuQljI2VCsd+GNSvCvD RIVW2dJGvIOuR+BDFS+FSI2fSNkrAcSGzdF1R9Ej0OAwCYcmd8y+GDtyD5fH0K1spNAS mDw96u1+ZlrzfhgmAVIMi4i2dw14gX/Nzd6yYiWfkza4XdC0Xs1k1x9VLUBT2G4wUZ00 nUdw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3G8QwEpSejKlOr7Vq9Esy2nITXV6fO7h+weqEQe9n2GjOmQg/r kwbtDCV3ADN5UcTTYEin0Oi1T8K2v7pFFQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5bFxDWGbbGmig6ixxjn+uSjd52l1eDBUUsKMtDS3b6kaGWPN+1AMzNcNv3vRBsayxftdwBSkZxy4S36A== X-Received: from chooglen.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:24:72f4:c0a8:26d9]) (user=chooglen job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:90a:2c4f:b0:203:70c0:9c0d with SMTP id p15-20020a17090a2c4f00b0020370c09c0dmr6632656pjm.21.1664316124330; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:01:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Join us for Review Club! From: Glen Choo To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christophe Poucet , Josh Steadmon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Glen Choo writes: > >> [2] http://tinyurl.com/gitcal >> Note that the gitcal event is a little out of date; it should say >> say "Please contact Josh Steadmon _and_ Glen >> Choo ...". > > I can make that happen, but do you really want both of them to be > contacted? Yes, I'd prefer that both of us get the email in case either us is unavailable. In the longer term, if Review Club is more of a project-wide effort instead of Google-specific (which I really hope will happen :)), we'll find a better approach than "email all admins". > Also do you (or Josh) want a write access to update > these details? You two clearly have a demonostrated need to such an > access. Yes, giving both of us write access sounds very helpful, thanks!.