From: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Use default values from settings instead of config
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:29:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kl6l1r4p3mi3.fsf@chooglen-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wnmihswp.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> ...how isn't disabling those t3800-mktag.sh tests just plasting over
> corruption that we're noticing because of your changes to (rightly) fix
> the bug where "fsck" wasn't checking the graph at all?
>
> IOW haven't we just found exactly the sort of bug that
> "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH" is put in place to find for us, but now instead
> of fixing it we're hiding it?
>
> If I comment yout your addition of GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=0 in that file
> I see that we fail N number of tests, but all of them are actually
> fallout of just this test:
>
> git replace $head_parent $head &&
> git replace -f $tree $blob
>
> I.e. we've created a replacement object replacing a tree with a blob, as
> part of tests I added to test how mktag handles those sorts of weird
> edge cases.
>
> This then causes the graph verify code to throw a hissy fit with:
>
> root tree OID for commit 0ddfaf193ff13d6ab39b7cbd9eed645e3ee2f050 in
> commit-graph is da5497437fd67ca928333aab79c4b4b55036ea66 !=
> 0fbca9850869684085d654f9e1380c9780802570
>
> I.e. when we wrote the graph we somehow didn't notice that the root tree
> node we wrote is to an object that's not actually a tree? Isn't this a
> bug where some part of the commit graph writing should be doing its own
> extended OID lookup that's replacement-object aware, it didn't, and we
> wrote a corrupt graph as a result?
>
> If there is a legitimate reason why we're not just hiding a bug we've
> turned up with these fixes let's disable that one test, not the entire
> test file.
>
> If you don't run the one test that fails (which is split up into 3
> individual pieces) there's still 143 other tests that are run, all of
> those presumably benefit from finding future bugs with
> GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=true, particularly since the test file seems to
> just have turned up one just now...
I think this falls on my shoulders. I assumed that the failures were
expected behavior, not bugs. You are right that we shouldn't be
plastering over bugs.
I'll have to ask for help here because I don't know enough about mktag
to distinguish between 'expected' and 'unexpected' failures. The best I
can do is to add GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=0 + NEEDSWORK for the failing
tests. But if that's good enough for now, I'll just do that :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-12 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-13 18:12 [PATCH 0/3] Use default values from settings instead of config Glen Choo
2021-09-13 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] fsck: verify commit graph when implicitly enabled Glen Choo
2021-09-13 19:29 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-13 19:33 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-13 19:36 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-13 23:15 ` Glen Choo
2021-09-13 23:32 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-14 1:09 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-14 2:05 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-14 1:07 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-13 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] fsck: verify multi-pack-index when implictly enabled Glen Choo
2021-09-13 19:35 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-13 18:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] gc: perform incremental repack " Glen Choo
2021-09-13 19:37 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-14 17:41 ` Glen Choo
2021-09-14 4:00 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2021-09-16 17:15 ` Glen Choo
2021-09-13 19:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] Use default values from settings instead of config Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 " Glen Choo
2021-09-17 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] fsck: verify commit graph when implicitly enabled Glen Choo
2021-09-29 6:09 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-30 18:00 ` Glen Choo
2021-09-30 18:35 ` Glen Choo
2021-09-30 18:39 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-10-01 17:28 ` Glen Choo
2021-09-17 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] fsck: verify multi-pack-index when implictly enabled Glen Choo
2021-09-29 6:20 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-29 22:56 ` Glen Choo
2021-09-17 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] gc: perform incremental repack " Glen Choo
2021-09-29 6:39 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-27 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Use default values from settings instead of config Glen Choo
2021-09-29 6:43 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-29 22:53 ` Glen Choo
2021-10-05 0:19 ` [PATCH v3 " Glen Choo
2021-10-05 0:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] fsck: verify commit graph when implicitly enabled Glen Choo
2021-10-05 0:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] fsck: verify multi-pack-index when implictly enabled Glen Choo
2021-10-05 0:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] gc: perform incremental repack " Glen Choo
2021-10-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Use default values from settings instead of config Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-10-05 17:43 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-10-05 19:10 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-10-05 22:25 ` Glen Choo
2021-10-09 7:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-10-11 19:58 ` Glen Choo
2021-10-11 20:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-10-11 20:48 ` Glen Choo
2021-10-12 17:42 ` [PATCH v4 " Glen Choo
2021-10-12 17:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] fsck: verify commit graph when implicitly enabled Glen Choo
2021-10-12 17:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] fsck: verify multi-pack-index when implictly enabled Glen Choo
2021-10-12 17:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] gc: perform incremental repack " Glen Choo
2021-10-12 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Use default values from settings instead of config Junio C Hamano
2021-10-12 20:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-10-12 22:29 ` Glen Choo [this message]
2021-10-14 15:53 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-10-13 13:12 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-10-13 15:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-10-14 16:53 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-10-14 22:21 ` Glen Choo
2021-10-14 23:38 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-10-14 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-10-15 15:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-10-15 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 " Glen Choo
2021-10-15 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] fsck: verify commit graph when implicitly enabled Glen Choo
2021-10-15 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] fsck: verify multi-pack-index when implictly enabled Glen Choo
2021-10-15 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] gc: perform incremental repack " Glen Choo
2021-10-15 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Use default values from settings instead of config Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=kl6l1r4p3mi3.fsf@chooglen-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=chooglen@google.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).