From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3441F406 for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 22:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221208 header.b=3wSS2676; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235374AbjEIWao (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2023 18:30:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59894 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230264AbjEIWan (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2023 18:30:43 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com (mail-yb1-xb49.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 962A326A5 for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 15:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-b99ef860a40so11899881276.3 for ; Tue, 09 May 2023 15:30:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1683671441; x=1686263441; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ukGbfWlrD6UQiWkZefJDqFDguyP+deMwyhL02tNBHlE=; b=3wSS2676kFmdwvppMA7YwULufNg8eaS6jEEuOUpRguYxstqcCMLCuCIVsvroa2jQFa Yvi8M0RazumjxNipizn18TvULEhAvd87KYZ0uJyJYcR4cbIXs80QdInS0uskQiGDG/Wb a/1CCQ7LYtFWPcEIgqYWZL4QwA9d5/uamftN3vzLCkfg/fV2edcUQjF7r3azJgZkU7/e LrTdWeJ4aheH2+l+P6eMt5ZVjD7dXiLpgx44tsnqlUYzoOL/ehgI2TKbwkZL2ZBrfQHD wgQm0hLXLG7cKk+lD+qp4cozeIE8LwZOOtodWnmATgEeVck8QB04lHSjJM8AxUluKDYs oP+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683671441; x=1686263441; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ukGbfWlrD6UQiWkZefJDqFDguyP+deMwyhL02tNBHlE=; b=Tr3yo+RbvQHWzqT/2tvm+ss2u0wIYMwW3LgkaVbP4w9laTu2IOQ44LAxou4yGUbG7J amVKNua0soYGfsSk8nZBrNH4uHNaO8LWcgnEI6jXYIpn53PQPevR95FUd0L27CEYD7Qc xlZwepwixgTMTKvw+XqNKoEfVSYZL4TJta08l5ubrrMk24ZfRavgAwQvWNGQtrLwEws0 jF1z8jLjIf5GPf/Sh0BY6oilOGwvyg6UgcnTOy3UTI4hZC+ErpYlg21fRYNkGuyG+9Tz R4gXQtx+5Xp94blCeAiuuopM3ImmBURRFN+cYGBG7xnI//FDxBa1G8OuggKQertxUrPU HONw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyXDlnqTGIBiip97x04Efz5/Hf1ieOUWvO+N3t/b6w9Vvjj3xnM 2VWxbUie76XYCzwEjVwAwIt+T0C0tnyvHQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5NjI871Ni3TMZqleWVNazl0Zb8rnBTS4qzAxOCNBWCnSYsaSOrhqq6fIsyUfY3l5QctPvesw32F3/2ZA== X-Received: from chooglen.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:24:72f4:c0a8:3a07]) (user=chooglen job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:5b84:0:b0:ba2:da66:3d37 with SMTP id p126-20020a255b84000000b00ba2da663d37mr3364140ybb.10.1683671440896; Tue, 09 May 2023 15:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 15:30:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <826b8b7bc0d7d6a76f6fd19d8f4a8460af61e9cf.1683636885.git.ps@pks.im> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <826b8b7bc0d7d6a76f6fd19d8f4a8460af61e9cf.1683636885.git.ps@pks.im> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] fetch: move display format parsing into main function From: Glen Choo To: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Junio C Hamano , Felipe Contreras , Jonathan Tan , Jacob Keller Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Patrick Steinhardt writes: > with the `fetch.output` config key set. We're thus going to introduce a > new `--output-format` switch for git-fetch(1) so that the output format > can be configured more directly. This is stale as of v3, since isn't named --output-format any more. Let me see if there are other instances of this. (I should have caught this earlier; I only saw it because Junio quoted it in a reply of his.)