From: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, avarab@gmail.com,
sandals@crustytoothpaste.net, tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com,
Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] git-cli.txt: clarify "options first and then args"
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:21:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe748304d94e0ae25fd3549aadc49cf951ff2d64.1642405806.git.dyroneteng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1642405806.git.dyroneteng@gmail.com>
There are some commands permit the user whether to provide options
first before args, or the reverse order. For example:
git push --dry-run <remote> <ref>
And:
git push <remote> <ref> --dry-run
Both of them is supported, but some commands do not, for instance:
git ls-remote --heads <remote>
And:
git ls-remote <remote> --heads
If <remote> only has one ref and it's name is "refs/heads/--heads", you
will get the same result, otherwise will not.This is because the former
in the second example will parse "--heads" as an "option" which means
to limit to only "refs/heads" when listing the remote references, the
latter treat "--heads" as an argument which means to filter the result
list with the given pattern.
Therefore, we want to specify a bit more in "gitcli.txt" about the way
we recommend and help to resolve the ambiguity around some git command
usage. The related disscussions locate at [1].
By the way, there are some issues with lowercase letters in the document,
which have been modified together.
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1642129840.git.dyroneteng@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/gitcli.txt | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitcli.txt b/Documentation/gitcli.txt
index 92e4ba6a2f..1819a5a185 100644
--- a/Documentation/gitcli.txt
+++ b/Documentation/gitcli.txt
@@ -19,6 +19,15 @@ Many commands take revisions (most often "commits", but sometimes
"tree-ish", depending on the context and command) and paths as their
arguments. Here are the rules:
+ * Options come first and then args.
+ A subcommand may take dashed options (which may take their own
+ arguments, e.g. "--max-parents 2") and arguments. You SHOULD
+ give dashed options first and then arguments. Some commands may
+ accept dashed options after you have already gave non-option
+ arguments (which may make the command ambiguous), but you should
+ not rely on it (because eventually we may find a way to fix
+ these ambiguity by enforcing the "options then args" rule).
+
* Revisions come first and then paths.
E.g. in `git diff v1.0 v2.0 arch/x86 include/asm-x86`,
`v1.0` and `v2.0` are revisions and `arch/x86` and `include/asm-x86`
@@ -72,24 +81,24 @@ you will.
Here are the rules regarding the "flags" that you should follow when you are
scripting Git:
- * it's preferred to use the non-dashed form of Git commands, which means that
+ * It's preferred to use the non-dashed form of Git commands, which means that
you should prefer `git foo` to `git-foo`.
- * splitting short options to separate words (prefer `git foo -a -b`
+ * Splitting short options to separate words (prefer `git foo -a -b`
to `git foo -ab`, the latter may not even work).
- * when a command-line option takes an argument, use the 'stuck' form. In
+ * When a command-line option takes an argument, use the 'stuck' form. In
other words, write `git foo -oArg` instead of `git foo -o Arg` for short
options, and `git foo --long-opt=Arg` instead of `git foo --long-opt Arg`
for long options. An option that takes optional option-argument must be
written in the 'stuck' form.
- * when you give a revision parameter to a command, make sure the parameter is
+ * When you give a revision parameter to a command, make sure the parameter is
not ambiguous with a name of a file in the work tree. E.g. do not write
`git log -1 HEAD` but write `git log -1 HEAD --`; the former will not work
if you happen to have a file called `HEAD` in the work tree.
- * many commands allow a long option `--option` to be abbreviated
+ * Many commands allow a long option `--option` to be abbreviated
only to their unique prefix (e.g. if there is no other option
whose name begins with `opt`, you may be able to spell `--opt` to
invoke the `--option` flag), but you should fully spell them out
--
2.34.1.391.g9ef3d6f133
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-17 7:56 [PATCH v1 0/1] gitcli: clarify "options first and then args" Teng Long
2022-01-17 8:21 ` Teng Long [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe748304d94e0ae25fd3549aadc49cf951ff2d64.1642405806.git.dyroneteng@gmail.com \
--to=dyroneteng@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).