From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Walter Bright Subject: Re: [RFC] Convert builin-mailinfo.c to use The Better String Library. Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:54:05 -0700 Organization: Digital Mars Message-ID: References: <4AFD7EAD1AAC4E54A416BA3F6E6A9E52@ntdev.corp.microsoft.com> <20070907094120.GA27754@artemis.corp> <20070907194115.GA23483@artemis.corp> <20070907205604.GC23483@artemis.corp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 08 00:54:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITmiU-0006fQ-OR for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:54:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750940AbXIGWyR (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:54:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750919AbXIGWyR (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:54:17 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:49801 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750836AbXIGWyQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:54:16 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ITmiH-00036j-0K for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:54:09 +0200 Received: from c-24-16-50-251.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.16.50.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:54:08 +0200 Received: from boost by c-24-16-50-251.hsd1.wa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:54:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-16-50-251.hsd1.wa.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <20070907205604.GC23483@artemis.corp> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Sure, but it does not works on amd64 properly (and it's the > architecture I care about) and is not ready for the current gcc (4.2, > only 4.1 builds) and so on. It's not as stable as DMD is. It does not > lags too much version-wise, it lags in maturity. But well, youth has a > cure: time :) Yes, and the more people use it, the better it will get. These are all environmental problems, not technical limitations of the language.