From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FE11F4B4 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 18:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728056AbhAPSMx (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 13:12:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52482 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727925AbhAPSMp (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 13:12:45 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45EAC061786 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:11:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id o10so3765771wmc.1 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:11:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:date:subject:fcc :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:to:cc; bh=Xm0Voi53c0mnE8hDYhxruCcV27lZV8ePud0DYZZitXM=; b=qqDf8YXy8wc3B44x00tLioI3Q621+GZC3pAOLsxRAxu6P9ZR3Bd69tGl/hh+Y5nmUf +/Zn+X9WjhkuM77B5wlY9g0HzaR+VMg1lPg1L6cxICCDk1YuDonT1lSZ4lBgobh254Xn 68GGp8aerIU3E9q/o02iaHvALCyUdI014Fdh83VLW3bAfcIH1CZq7OMF5XwyZK2l1/Kh ARoC0L+2D1ZG3xu0YL+76fAMDqVto4bC71WUmljQJPshPgvmqoiBpN4EA04JS7YX4IuJ DZfyMsZKaW1r4FAJl9VgZXhY/wzRk04Y+d7h29qTBlY4D+Q0HDVre990rui7dxSa1rhj fhIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:date :subject:fcc:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:to:cc; bh=Xm0Voi53c0mnE8hDYhxruCcV27lZV8ePud0DYZZitXM=; b=uONdCDjbAmwLnNpxNFxMgSUlHeZNrnkHSVa79NsR5GzbY1kQwFYiqgGkOVEgXaZnDb yzy4ROwZYex2F57Wru2hJK/VlJCLah0rsKJucGSq7Odl5ZBIR+E3tLQ2cHl/rrQO1JP/ UaL5rmWwOI0kU1HMahCoP8503Nhe4j1ElLc58DlA6/AD+wd/IXrgOoCYMWAgWSzBcPr/ WLjN4bDADPMBEzWXTE+P8X/iTDnYXllPgqRgBhmzkNKuiQSoObHZ3IHnlw/bj9gEknGQ S3CRZwKTjldyu/+RXqcGn3MFUDLEUS/aELQu5Mh+pHIw3u1a++pyb8DqNY3HfEdKvxNp cQeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ftiwTrSrSld0Zab+0t+L0hkdrCqITQNlLzO5mJ5tDOJSmz+fL ULAGJpVHmQa+Jtc7HcNduYlBWsEleq4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2wqWugzBMKbg8Bwtb+MtpJVUlCt/0fY2+d8KnIdmcebhAQ7jo+k7zD1G2m9jcOuBakKExYw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1bcc:: with SMTP id b195mr14084603wmb.131.1610820691179; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:11:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([13.74.141.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10sm2054595wmj.2.2021.01.16.10.11.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:11:30 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: From: "Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget" Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 18:11:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v6 09/11] commit-graph: use generation v2 only if entire chain does Fcc: Sent Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Derrick Stolee , Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= , Taylor Blau , Abhishek Kumar , SZEDER =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , Abhishek Kumar , Abhishek Kumar Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org From: Abhishek Kumar Since there are released versions of Git that understand generation numbers in the commit-graph's CDAT chunk but do not understand the GDAT chunk, the following scenario is possible: 1. "New" Git writes a commit-graph with the GDAT chunk. 2. "Old" Git writes a split commit-graph on top without a GDAT chunk. If each layer of split commit-graph is treated independently, as it was the case before this commit, with Git inspecting only the current layer for chunk_generation_data pointer, commits in the lower layer (one with GDAT) whould have corrected commit date as their generation number, while commits in the upper layer would have topological levels as their generation. Corrected commit dates usually have much larger values than topological levels. This means that if we take two commits, one from the upper layer, and one reachable from it in the lower layer, then the expectation that the generation of a parent is smaller than the generation of a child would be violated. It is difficult to expose this issue in a test. Since we _start_ with artificially low generation numbers, any commit walk that prioritizes generation numbers will walk all of the commits with high generation number before walking the commits with low generation number. In all the cases I tried, the commit-graph layers themselves "protect" any incorrect behavior since none of the commits in the lower layer can reach the commits in the upper layer. This issue would manifest itself as a performance problem in this case, especially with something like "git log --graph" since the low generation numbers would cause the in-degree queue to walk all of the commits in the lower layer before allowing the topo-order queue to write anything to output (depending on the size of the upper layer). Therefore, When writing the new layer in split commit-graph, we write a GDAT chunk only if the topmost layer has a GDAT chunk. This guarantees that if a layer has GDAT chunk, all lower layers must have a GDAT chunk as well. Rewriting layers follows similar approach: if the topmost layer below the set of layers being rewritten (in the split commit-graph chain) exists, and it does not contain GDAT chunk, then the result of rewrite does not have GDAT chunks either. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar --- commit-graph.c | 30 +++++- commit-graph.h | 1 + t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c index 7365958d9d3..d32492f3724 100644 --- a/commit-graph.c +++ b/commit-graph.c @@ -614,6 +614,21 @@ static struct commit_graph *load_commit_graph_chain(struct repository *r, return graph_chain; } +static void validate_mixed_generation_chain(struct commit_graph *g) +{ + int read_generation_data; + + if (!g) + return; + + read_generation_data = !!g->chunk_generation_data; + + while (g) { + g->read_generation_data = read_generation_data; + g = g->base_graph; + } +} + struct commit_graph *read_commit_graph_one(struct repository *r, struct object_directory *odb) { @@ -622,6 +637,8 @@ struct commit_graph *read_commit_graph_one(struct repository *r, if (!g) g = load_commit_graph_chain(r, odb); + validate_mixed_generation_chain(g); + return g; } @@ -791,7 +808,7 @@ static void fill_commit_graph_info(struct commit *item, struct commit_graph *g, date_low = get_be32(commit_data + g->hash_len + 12); item->date = (timestamp_t)((date_high << 32) | date_low); - if (g->chunk_generation_data) { + if (g->read_generation_data) { offset = (timestamp_t)get_be32(g->chunk_generation_data + sizeof(uint32_t) * lex_index); if (offset & CORRECTED_COMMIT_DATE_OFFSET_OVERFLOW) { @@ -2019,6 +2036,13 @@ static void split_graph_merge_strategy(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx) if (i < ctx->num_commit_graphs_after) ctx->commit_graph_hash_after[i] = xstrdup(oid_to_hex(&g->oid)); + /* + * If the topmost remaining layer has generation data chunk, the + * resultant layer also has generation data chunk. + */ + if (i == ctx->num_commit_graphs_after - 2) + ctx->write_generation_data = !!g->chunk_generation_data; + i--; g = g->base_graph; } @@ -2343,6 +2367,8 @@ int write_commit_graph(struct object_directory *odb, } else ctx->num_commit_graphs_after = 1; + validate_mixed_generation_chain(ctx->r->objects->commit_graph); + compute_generation_numbers(ctx); if (ctx->changed_paths) @@ -2541,7 +2567,7 @@ int verify_commit_graph(struct repository *r, struct commit_graph *g, int flags) * also GENERATION_NUMBER_V1_MAX. Decrement to avoid extra logic * in the following condition. */ - if (!g->chunk_generation_data && max_generation == GENERATION_NUMBER_V1_MAX) + if (!g->read_generation_data && max_generation == GENERATION_NUMBER_V1_MAX) max_generation--; generation = commit_graph_generation(graph_commit); diff --git a/commit-graph.h b/commit-graph.h index 19a02001fde..ad52130883b 100644 --- a/commit-graph.h +++ b/commit-graph.h @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct commit_graph { struct object_directory *odb; uint32_t num_commits_in_base; + unsigned int read_generation_data; struct commit_graph *base_graph; const uint32_t *chunk_oid_fanout; diff --git a/t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh b/t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh index 587757b62d9..8e90f3423b8 100755 --- a/t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh +++ b/t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh @@ -453,4 +453,185 @@ test_expect_success 'prevent regression for duplicate commits across layers' ' git -C dup commit-graph verify ' +NUM_FIRST_LAYER_COMMITS=64 +NUM_SECOND_LAYER_COMMITS=16 +NUM_THIRD_LAYER_COMMITS=7 +NUM_FOURTH_LAYER_COMMITS=8 +NUM_FIFTH_LAYER_COMMITS=16 +SECOND_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START=$(($NUM_FIRST_LAYER_COMMITS + 1)) +SECOND_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END=$(($SECOND_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START + $NUM_SECOND_LAYER_COMMITS - 1)) +THIRD_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START=$(($SECOND_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END + 1)) +THIRD_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END=$(($THIRD_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START + $NUM_THIRD_LAYER_COMMITS - 1)) +FOURTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START=$(($THIRD_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END + 1)) +FOURTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END=$(($FOURTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START + $NUM_FOURTH_LAYER_COMMITS - 1)) +FIFTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START=$(($FOURTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END + 1)) +FIFTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END=$(($FIFTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START + $NUM_FIFTH_LAYER_COMMITS - 1)) + +# Current split graph chain: +# +# 16 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 64 commits (GDAT) +# +test_expect_success 'setup repo for mixed generation commit-graph-chain' ' + graphdir=".git/objects/info/commit-graphs" && + test_oid_cache <<-EOF && + oid_version sha1:1 + oid_version sha256:2 + EOF + git init mixed && + ( + cd mixed && + git config core.commitGraph true && + git config gc.writeCommitGraph false && + for i in $(test_seq $NUM_FIRST_LAYER_COMMITS) + do + test_commit $i && + git branch commits/$i || return 1 + done && + git commit-graph write --reachable --split && + graph_read_expect $NUM_FIRST_LAYER_COMMITS && + test_line_count = 1 $graphdir/commit-graph-chain && + for i in $(test_seq $SECOND_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START $SECOND_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END) + do + test_commit $i && + git branch commits/$i || return 1 + done && + GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT=1 git commit-graph write --reachable --split=no-merge && + test_line_count = 2 $graphdir/commit-graph-chain && + test-tool read-graph >output && + cat >expect <<-EOF && + header: 43475048 1 $(test_oid oid_version) 4 1 + num_commits: $NUM_SECOND_LAYER_COMMITS + chunks: oid_fanout oid_lookup commit_metadata + EOF + test_cmp expect output && + git commit-graph verify && + cat $graphdir/commit-graph-chain + ) +' + +# The new layer will be added without generation data chunk as it was not +# present on the layer underneath it. +# +# 7 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 16 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 64 commits (GDAT) +# +test_expect_success 'do not write generation data chunk if not present on existing tip' ' + git clone mixed mixed-no-gdat && + ( + cd mixed-no-gdat && + for i in $(test_seq $THIRD_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START $THIRD_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END) + do + test_commit $i && + git branch commits/$i || return 1 + done && + git commit-graph write --reachable --split=no-merge && + test_line_count = 3 $graphdir/commit-graph-chain && + test-tool read-graph >output && + cat >expect <<-EOF && + header: 43475048 1 $(test_oid oid_version) 4 2 + num_commits: $NUM_THIRD_LAYER_COMMITS + chunks: oid_fanout oid_lookup commit_metadata + EOF + test_cmp expect output && + git commit-graph verify + ) +' + +# Number of commits in each layer of the split-commit graph before merge: +# +# 8 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 7 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 16 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 64 commits (GDAT) +# +# The top two layers are merged and do not have generation data chunk as layer below them does +# not have generation data chunk. +# +# 15 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 16 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 64 commits (GDAT) +# +test_expect_success 'do not write generation data chunk if the topmost remaining layer does not have generation data chunk' ' + git clone mixed-no-gdat mixed-merge-no-gdat && + ( + cd mixed-merge-no-gdat && + for i in $(test_seq $FOURTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START $FOURTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END) + do + test_commit $i && + git branch commits/$i || return 1 + done && + git commit-graph write --reachable --split --size-multiple 1 && + test_line_count = 3 $graphdir/commit-graph-chain && + test-tool read-graph >output && + cat >expect <<-EOF && + header: 43475048 1 $(test_oid oid_version) 4 2 + num_commits: $(($NUM_THIRD_LAYER_COMMITS + $NUM_FOURTH_LAYER_COMMITS)) + chunks: oid_fanout oid_lookup commit_metadata + EOF + test_cmp expect output && + git commit-graph verify + ) +' + +# Number of commits in each layer of the split-commit graph before merge: +# +# 16 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 15 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 16 commits (No GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 64 commits (GDAT) +# +# The top three layers are merged and has generation data chunk as the topmost remaining layer +# has generation data chunk. +# +# 47 commits (GDAT) +# ------------------------ +# 64 commits (GDAT) +# +test_expect_success 'write generation data chunk if topmost remaining layer has generation data chunk' ' + git clone mixed-merge-no-gdat mixed-merge-gdat && + ( + cd mixed-merge-gdat && + for i in $(test_seq $FIFTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_START $FIFTH_LAYER_SEQUENCE_END) + do + test_commit $i && + git branch commits/$i || return 1 + done && + git commit-graph write --reachable --split --size-multiple 1 && + test_line_count = 2 $graphdir/commit-graph-chain && + test-tool read-graph >output && + cat >expect <<-EOF && + header: 43475048 1 $(test_oid oid_version) 5 1 + num_commits: $(($NUM_SECOND_LAYER_COMMITS + $NUM_THIRD_LAYER_COMMITS + $NUM_FOURTH_LAYER_COMMITS + $NUM_FIFTH_LAYER_COMMITS)) + chunks: oid_fanout oid_lookup commit_metadata generation_data + EOF + test_cmp expect output + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'write generation data chunk when commit-graph chain is replaced' ' + git clone mixed mixed-replace && + ( + cd mixed-replace && + git commit-graph write --reachable --split=replace && + test_path_is_file $graphdir/commit-graph-chain && + test_line_count = 1 $graphdir/commit-graph-chain && + verify_chain_files_exist $graphdir && + graph_read_expect $(($NUM_FIRST_LAYER_COMMITS + $NUM_SECOND_LAYER_COMMITS)) && + git commit-graph verify + ) +' + test_done -- gitgitgadget