From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rebase --exec: make it work with --rebase-merges
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 16:23:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7da64c2-0477-07dd-35ef-7cfd16447bd5@talktalk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ca441a89674ee77cbbb3ec17f931aecba7bfa0d.1533549169.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Hi Johannes
On 06/08/18 10:52, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
>
> The idea of `--exec` is to append an `exec` call after each `pick`.
>
> Since the introduction of fixup!/squash! commits, this idea was extended
> to apply to "pick, possibly followed by a fixup/squash chain", i.e. an
> exec would not be inserted between a `pick` and any of its corresponding
> `fixup` or `squash` lines.
>
> The current implementation uses a dirty trick to achieve that: it
> assumes that there are only pick/fixup/squash commands, and then
> *inserts* the `exec` lines before any `pick` but the first, and appends
> a final one.
>
> With the todo lists generated by `git rebase --rebase-merges`, this
> simple implementation shows its problems: it produces the exact wrong
> thing when there are `label`, `reset` and `merge` commands.
>
> Let's change the implementation to do exactly what we want: look for
> `pick` lines, skip any fixup/squash chains, and then insert the `exec`
> line. Lather, rinse, repeat.
>
> While at it, also add `exec` lines after `merge` commands, because they
> are similar in spirit to `pick` commands: they add new commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
> sequencer.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 31038472f..ed2e694ff 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -4244,10 +4244,9 @@ int sequencer_add_exec_commands(const char *commands)
> {
> const char *todo_file = rebase_path_todo();
> struct todo_list todo_list = TODO_LIST_INIT;
> - struct todo_item *item;
> struct strbuf *buf = &todo_list.buf;
> size_t offset = 0, commands_len = strlen(commands);
> - int i, first;
> + int i, insert;
>
> if (strbuf_read_file(&todo_list.buf, todo_file, 0) < 0)
> return error(_("could not read '%s'."), todo_file);
> @@ -4257,19 +4256,37 @@ int sequencer_add_exec_commands(const char *commands)
> return error(_("unusable todo list: '%s'"), todo_file);
> }
>
> - first = 1;
> - /* insert <commands> before every pick except the first one */
> - for (item = todo_list.items, i = 0; i < todo_list.nr; i++, item++) {
> - if (item->command == TODO_PICK && !first) {
> - strbuf_insert(buf, item->offset_in_buf + offset,
> - commands, commands_len);
> + /*
> + * Insert <commands> after every pick. Here, fixup/squash chains
> + * are considered part of the pick, so we insert the commands *after*
> + * those chains if there are any.
> + */
> + insert = -1;
> + for (i = 0; i < todo_list.nr; i++) {
> + enum todo_command command = todo_list.items[i].command;
> +
> + if (insert >= 0) {
> + /* skip fixup/squash chains */
> + if (command == TODO_COMMENT)
> + continue;
insert is not updated so if the next command is not a fixup the exec
line will be inserted before the comment.
> + else if (is_fixup(command)) {
> + insert = i + 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> + strbuf_insert(buf,
> + todo_list.items[insert].offset_in_buf +
> + offset, commands, commands_len);
> offset += commands_len;
> + insert = -1;
> }
> - first = 0;
> +
> + if (command == TODO_PICK || command == TODO_MERGE)
> + insert = i + 1;
> }
>
> /* append final <commands> */
> - strbuf_add(buf, commands, commands_len);
> + if (insert >= 0 || !offset)
> + strbuf_add(buf, commands, commands_len);
Having read your other message about this patch I think if you wanted to
fix the position of the final exec in the case where the todo list ends
with a comment you could do something like
if (insert >= 0)
strbuf_insert(buf,
todo_list.items[insert].offset_in_buf +
offset, commands, commands_len);
else
strbuf_add(buf, commands, commands_len);
I'm not sure it matters that much though
The rest of this patch looks fine to me
Best Wishes
Phillip
>
> i = write_message(buf->buf, buf->len, todo_file, 0);
> todo_list_release(&todo_list);
> diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh
> index 0bf5eaa37..90ae613e2 100755
> --- a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh
> +++ b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ test_expect_success 'octopus merges' '
> EOF
> '
>
> -test_expect_failure 'with --autosquash and --exec' '
> +test_expect_success 'with --autosquash and --exec' '
> git checkout -b with-exec H &&
> echo Booh >B.t &&
> test_tick &&
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-06 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 17:42 [PATCH 0/2] Make git rebase work with --rebase-merges and --exec Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-08-03 17:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] t3430: demonstrate what -r, --autosquash & --exec should do Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-08-03 17:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] rebase --exec: make it work with --rebase-merges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-08-03 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-06 9:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-06 9:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-06 15:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-03 20:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-06 9:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-06 9:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Make git rebase work with --rebase-merges and --exec Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-08-06 9:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t3430: demonstrate what -r, --autosquash & --exec should do Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-08-06 9:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rebase --exec: make it work with --rebase-merges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-08-06 15:23 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2018-08-06 16:00 ` Phillip Wood
2018-08-09 9:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-09 10:04 ` Phillip Wood
2018-08-09 13:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-06 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Make git rebase work with --rebase-merges and --exec Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-09 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-08-09 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t3430: demonstrate what -r, --autosquash & --exec should do Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-08-09 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] rebase --exec: make it work with --rebase-merges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7da64c2-0477-07dd-35ef-7cfd16447bd5@talktalk.net \
--to=phillip.wood@talktalk.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).