Re: What's in git.git

[Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>]

Junio C Hamano wrote:

> * The 'master' branch has these since the last announcement.
> 
>   I've flushed all the 'gitweb/' changes from "next" and core
>   support that some of them needed; notably "for-each-ref" and
>   "blame --porcelain" is now in "master".  Oh, and "annotate"
>   is now a mere synonym for "blame -c".
[...]
>    Junio C Hamano (20):
[...]
>       gitweb: prepare for repositories with packed refs.
[...]
>       gitweb: use for-each-ref to show the latest activity across branches

This unfortunately means that I cannot test gitweb based on 'master'
branch using _released_ git core, git version 1.4.3.3, as it doesn't have
git-for-each-ref nor git-show-ref.

BTW. do people often use latest gitweb with older git binaries? Should
we try to wait for core feature to mature to released version before using
it in gitweb? Or perhaps we should add some kind of version checking, and
provide workrounds, e.g. using $ENV{GIT_DIR} if git core doesn't support
--git-dir option, pathlimit filtering using git-rev-list piped to 
git-diff-tree --stdin in git_history if there is no --full-history
option, show always HEAD activity if there is no git-for-each-ref
etc.; well the latest we can do without checking for git core version, just

        if -x qx($GIT --exec-path)/git-for-each-ref

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git