From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4F320467 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751970AbdJKWZi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:25:38 -0400 Received: from avasout08.plus.net ([212.159.14.20]:38486 "EHLO avasout08.plus.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751945AbdJKWZg (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:25:36 -0400 Received: from [10.0.2.15] ([147.147.86.16]) by avasout08 with smtp id LNRa1w0030M91Ur01NRbpx; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:25:35 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=EJl26xRC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=dubYQqM3tRRTmV8xSh8cXQ==:117 a=dubYQqM3tRRTmV8xSh8cXQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=VSiMYLrKmzgEjHXern4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-AUTH: ramsayjones@:2500 Subject: Re: v2.15.0-rc1 test failure From: Ramsay Jones To: Adam Dinwoodie Cc: GIT Mailing-list References: <8dd12465-0dc2-340e-8db0-e37719f34efc@ramsayjones.plus.com> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:25:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8dd12465-0dc2-340e-8db0-e37719f34efc@ramsayjones.plus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 11/10/17 23:15, Ramsay Jones wrote: > Hi Adam, > > I had a test failure on the v2.15.0-rc1 build tonight. > The test in question being t0021-conversion.sh #15 > ('required process filter should filter data'). I didn't > have any test failures on v2.15.0-rc0, and I don't see > any change that would have affected this test. > > Also, I ran this test by hand (well, in a shell loop) at > least 70 times tonight (after the test-suite run), without > any failures, so ... (unfortunately, I don't have a trash > directory to look at. :( ) > > I have just kicked off another full test-suite run. > > Just a heads up! ;-) Oops, for mailing list reader, I should have made clear that this failure is only on cygwin. :-D ATB, Ramsay Jones