From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] gitweb: Great subroutines renaming Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:29:00 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <200608071626.52655.jnareb@gmail.com> <7v7j1dnzo5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 13 11:28:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCCGo-0000dN-8a for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:28:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750858AbWHMJ2a (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:28:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750865AbWHMJ2a (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:28:30 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:36748 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750858AbWHMJ2a (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:28:30 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GCCGg-0000cU-Jt for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:28:26 +0200 Received: from host-81-190-24-83.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.24.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:28:26 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-24-83.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:28:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-24-83.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jakub Narebski writes: > >> I have series of gitweb patches to send: should I make them pre-rename, or >> post-rename? > > Do people happy with the general naming guidelines (I am)? > > I'll be pushing out 1.4.2 this weekend, and then moving all the > gitweb stuff pending in "next" to "master" after that. > > Let's have the rename immediately on top of it first, then > continue cleaning up after that. So after 1.4.2 gitweb patches should be based on next, or on master? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git