Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] WIP xdiff: markup duplicates differently

["Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>]

W dniu 03.09.2016 o 05:31, Stefan Beller pisze:

> When moving code (e.g. a function is moved to another part of the file or
> to a different file), the review process is different than reviewing new
> code. When reviewing moved code we are only interested in the diff as
> where there are differences in the moved code, e.g. namespace changes.
> 
> However the inner part of these moved texts should not change.
> To aid a developer reviewing such code, emit it with a different prefix
> than the usual +,- to indicate it is overlapping code.

What would be this different prefix?


Side note: I wonder if the cousin of unified diff, namely context diff[1],
is something that we can and should support.

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/manual/html_node/Context-Format.html
     https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/manual/html_node/Detailed-Context.html

*** lao	2002-02-21 23:30:39.942229878 -0800
--- tzu	2002-02-21 23:30:50.442260588 -0800
***************
*** 1,7 ****
- The Way that can be told of is not the eternal Way;
- The name that can be named is not the eternal name.
  The Nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth;
! The Named is the mother of all things.
  Therefore let there always be non-being,
    so we may see their subtlety,
  And let there always be being,
--- 1,6 ----
  The Nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth;
! The named is the mother of all things.
! 
  Therefore let there always be non-being,
    so we may see their subtlety,
  And let there always be being,
***************
*** 9,11 ****
--- 8,13 ----
  The two are the same,
  But after they are produced,
    they have different names.
+ They both may be called deep and profound.
+ Deeper and more profound,
+ The door of all subtleties!