From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Derrick Stolee" <stolee@gmail.com>,
"Lars Schneider" <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Duy Nguyen" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: worktrees vs. alternates
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 15:01:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8776c83-ea57-456d-5bc8-ca2fc990bed0@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1950199.Z2x8tXoTfI@mfick-lnx>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]
On 05/16/18 14:26, Martin Fick wrote:
> If you are going to keep the unreferenced objects around
> forever, it might be better to keep them around in packed
> form?
I'm undecided about that. On the one hand this does create lots of small
files and inevitably causes (some) performance degradation. On the other
hand, I don't want to keep useless objects in the pack, because that
would also cause performance degradation for people cloning the "mother
repo." If my assumptions on any of that are incorrect, I'm happy to
learn more.
Best,
--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Director, IT Infrastructure Security
The Linux Foundation
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 8:13 worktrees vs. alternates Lars Schneider
2018-05-16 9:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-05-16 9:42 ` Robert P. J. Day
2018-05-16 11:07 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-05-16 9:51 ` Lars Schneider
2018-05-16 10:33 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-05-16 13:02 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-05-16 14:58 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-05-16 15:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-05-16 15:49 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-05-16 17:54 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-05-16 17:14 ` Martin Fick
2018-05-16 17:41 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-05-16 18:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-05-16 18:12 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-05-16 18:26 ` Martin Fick
2018-05-16 19:01 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev [this message]
2018-05-16 19:03 ` Martin Fick
2018-05-16 19:11 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-05-16 19:18 ` Martin Fick
2018-05-16 19:23 ` Jeff King
2018-05-16 19:29 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-05-16 19:37 ` Jeff King
2018-05-16 19:40 ` Martin Fick
2018-05-16 20:06 ` Jeff King
2018-05-16 20:43 ` Martin Fick
2018-05-16 20:02 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-05-16 20:17 ` Jeff King
2018-05-17 0:43 ` Sitaram Chamarty
2018-05-17 3:31 ` Jeff King
2018-05-19 5:45 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-05-16 19:14 ` Jeff King
2018-05-16 21:18 ` Stefan Beller
2018-05-16 23:45 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8776c83-ea57-456d-5bc8-ca2fc990bed0@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
--cc=mfick@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).