From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4F920282 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751131AbdFTSuN (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:50:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:34810 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751076AbdFTSuM (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:50:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id y25so17453338wrd.1 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:50:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EOTY9Pf3LxNJjVcC1cyy/KiOsLzpJq5YHJbgrgbxU0A=; b=ScRlvY81jIL7v6qkrLfPmoZvBigRiyYzaCzQJ9d3b8H9LHj7M7jLZvxXXGYeYTS4+5 58Afhzcu3m5WCz0JWW7n/bJ4QvU4p3t1qwh+/uxiOw3fttuoh+3ZtslF+hvFf0AXNVW1 OK5uZp22hLkbhozHhkzHAqvlpSgbGNN8V/IuJA8nof9Pm9UoKr3QH1W9EUJpF5cPZLMr 97IaBT12ugmR15uSAXwu2HvIjcmsdyPILKLyYZpWpGyKmTWf3svsMJpqAoGUffng5OaM 1WKW9/rRaJG/XDTuJBARWQX2UfPBG3xLYB5MCxO/9tI16T3fbFryuyz2OXWOO9FQGX39 0J5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EOTY9Pf3LxNJjVcC1cyy/KiOsLzpJq5YHJbgrgbxU0A=; b=shoyeSaqf2R/iYx8oP6nQWZDZb/GgYWWrfv8/czs6hW+g+cGpG1QqZCoOpwXMT3zq/ U9KABwrRFNVWTetA/KI2bsqb+2nW6hJte1wtQOVS+FPc/vZgZDkhYYM+H64yDRoLpWjb v1LHKoA+M2CTuGDDXbJdUi77HWdL6OtAP8y71cPgZUQ24ryPorsl3mcCU/pMGOYqlLEo gzxN0cdHIsv54uc8RFNx7C2/gdO8iXJVzLkaTR4JqR5HSBPz8iMVKnow455XuNSrxH9b 7w1w2nC9daR+5aHEgiKeAfdQTZkG1iiFs958ZcQDnQItFu/e45El7bleDgfEHeQu9DP9 62qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxJwFqEnuTljQhETudwHnAMazUt5GdjgbIOSjS7EZcZlxT4Qzwa Hk4hNyukVnWIS5Ee X-Received: by 10.28.215.145 with SMTP id o139mr3905420wmg.105.1497984610912; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:a61:10a1:8501:1d3:dd00:46a5:793b? ([2001:a61:10a1:8501:1d3:dd00:46a5:793b]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b192sm11376166wmf.25.2017.06.20.11.50.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Transform log message during migration svn -> git (using git-svn) To: paul.mattke@s4m.com, larsxschneider@gmail.com Cc: git@vger.kernel.org References: <8ce2bf074fcf4d6181a29eb3e7fff132@GTLBML3EX0005.bagmail.net> <90ee80a910884e1e98fa8a5001ae850c@GTLBML3EX0005.bagmail.net> From: Andreas Heiduk Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:50:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <90ee80a910884e1e98fa8a5001ae850c@GTLBML3EX0005.bagmail.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: de-BE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 20.06.2017 um 14:32 schrieb paul.mattke@s4m.com: > Well this is a possibility, of course. Our problem is that our SVN > repository contains about 220.000 revisions currently. As a colleague of > mine said that the command you suggest might take about 4 seconds per > revision, it would take about 10 days to do this for our whole repository. > So of course it could save a lot of time generally if such operation could > be done immediately during git-svn. My data point is this: A "git filter branch" run with ~2000 revisions took several hours on a Windows 7 box. That number seems to be roughly the same as your number. A comparable run on a Linux box took only about 10 minutes. So: If your benchmark was done on Windows you might do that also on Linux.