From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E801F463 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727197AbfINHY5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:24:57 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:14226 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727188AbfINHY5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:24:57 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46VkY310V7z5tlB; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:24:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5B4DE; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:24:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Git_Gui_-_enhancement_suggestion_-_Can_a_double_cli?= =?UTF-8?Q?ck_on_the_file_name_in_the_=e2=80=9cunstaged=e2=80=9d_area_move_t?= =?UTF-8?Q?he_item_to_=e2=80=9cstaged_changes=e2=80=9d?= To: Pratyush Yadav Cc: Allan Ford , git@vger.kernel.org References: <20190913143229.5yop5oaascgavynl@yadavpratyush.com> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:24:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190913143229.5yop5oaascgavynl@yadavpratyush.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 13.09.19 um 16:32 schrieb Pratyush Yadav: > Is partial single and partial double click behaviour acceptable? Or > should we make the entire row double click only? Or something else that > I missed? I don't mind adding the suggested double-click action, but removing the single-click action would be a step backward IMO. -- Hannes