Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: git-worktree: Add side by side branch checkout example

["Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>]

On Thu, Oct 2, 2025, at 17:51, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>

I think this could do with more setup and motivation.

I’ve seen a lot of questions on worktrees where they introduce the
problem with “I use a bare repository with worktrees”.  And I was
puzzled that they kept using bare repositories all the time.  I’ve
forgotten some of those details but I do seem to remember that they were
motivated to go all-in on making a ton of worktrees, and using the the
“project root” to do it.

Is that what the bare-setup is getting at? ;)

> ---
>  Documentation/git-worktree.adoc | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-worktree.adoc b/Documentation/git-worktree.adoc
> index ec31863aec..122b191ff9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-worktree.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/git-worktree.adoc
> @@ -525,6 +525,16 @@ $ popd
>  $ git worktree remove ../temp
>  ------------
>
> +Side by side branch checkouts for a repository using multiple worktrees
> +
> +------------
> +mkdir some-repository
> +cd some-repository
> +git clone --bare gitforge@someforge.example.com:some-org/some-repository .git
> +git --git-dir=.git worktree add some-branch
> +git --git-dir=.git worktree add another-branch
> +------------

This works for me.  But why not this?

    git clone --bare <repo> some-repository
    cd some-repository
    git worktree add some-branch
    git worktree add another-branch

> +
>  BUGS
>  ----
>  Multiple checkout in general is still experimental, and the support
> --
> 2.51.0