From: William Sprent <williams@unity3d.com>
To: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>,
William Sprent via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Derrick Stolee" <derrickstolee@github.com>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ls-tree: add --sparse-filter-oid argument
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:55:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d96e6ab4-2302-5326-3a0e-bffecc24a295@unity3d.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42e14dda-cd2b-09df-dea8-246b3fcfac42@github.com>
On 25/01/2023 19.32, Victoria Dye wrote:
> William Sprent wrote:
>> On 24/01/2023 21.11, Victoria Dye wrote>> I haven't looked at your implementation in detail yet, but I did want to
>>> offer a recommendation in case you hadn't considered it: if you want to
>>> allow the use of patterns from a user-specified specific file, it would be
>>> nice to do it in a way that fully replaces the "default" sparse-checkout
>>> settings at the lowest level (i.e., override the values of
>>> 'core_apply_sparse_checkout', 'core_sparse_checkout_cone', and
>>> 'get_sparse_checkout_filename()'). Doing it that way would both make it
>>> easier for other commands to add a '--sparse-patterns' option, and avoid the
>>> separate code path ('path_in_sparse_checkout_1()' vs.
>>> 'recursively_match_path_with_sparse_patterns()', for example) when dealing
>>> with '.git/info/sparse-checkout' patterns vs. manually-specified patterns.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the pointers. I'll see what I can do. Do you mean something
>> along the line of the following?
>>
>> set_sparse_checkout_file(filename);
>> init_sparse_checkout_patterns(istate);
>> _ = path_in_sparse_checkout_1(some_path, istate, ...);
>>
>
> Sort of. I mentioned separating the options into "specify the sparse pattern
> file" and "restrict the displayed files to the active pattern set, if there
> is one". For the former, you might add an option like:
>
> OPT_FILENAME(0, "sparse-patterns", &sparse_pattern_file,
> N_("override sparse-checkout behavior using patterns from <file>"))
>
> Then do something like what you have, right after option parsing:
>
> if (sparse_pattern_file) {
> core_apply_sparse_checkout = 1;
> core_sparse_checkout_cone = <???>;
> set_sparse_checkout_file(filename);
> }
>
> If this option is specified, but the repo already has sparse
> patterns/settings of its own, you'll need to (carefully) override the repo's
> existing configuration:
>
> * 'core_apply_sparse_checkout' & 'core_sparse_checkout_cone' are set based
> on the repo config. You'll need to make sure those values are overridden
> before loading the sparse-checkout patterns, and also that they're set
> *after* loading the config.
This sounds a bit easy to get wrong to me, but I assume I can trust that the
config has been loaded by the time 'cmd_ls_tree()' is invoked.
> * Speaking of 'core_sparse_checkout_cone', there are a bunch of ways you
> might configure "cone-" vs. "non-cone" for your patterns (user-specified
> with yet another option, always assume one or the other, try deriving from
> the patterns). My preference would be to always assume "cone mode" - it's
> the direction Git has been moving with sparse-checkout over the past year,
> and still automatically "falls back" on non-cone patterns if the patterns
> can't be used in cone mode (with a warning from
> 'add_pattern_to_hashsets()': "disabling cone pattern matching").
Alright. I've had similar thoughts. But I ended up deciding to respect the
config value since there wouldn't be any way for the user to silence the warning
when passing non-cone mode patterns to the command. I don't feel too strongly about
it, though.
> * If the repo is using a sparse index, the existing sparse directories may
> not be compatible with the custom patterns. Probably easiest to force use
> of a full index, e.g. with 'command_requires_full_index = 1'.
>
OK.
> Fair warning: this probably isn't an exhaustive list of things that would
> need updating, and it'll need thorough testing to make sure there are no
> regressions. But, extending the underlying sparse-checkout infrastructure
> will (ideally) avoid duplicating code and make this behavior reusable across
> other commands.
>
Alright. I'll give it a shot.
> For the other desired behavior ("limit the files to the active
> sparse-checkout patterns"), you could add an option:
>
> OPT_CALLBACK_F(0, "scope", &sparse_scope, "(sparse|all)",
> N_("specify the scope of results with respect to the sparse-checkout"),
> PARSE_OPT_NONEG, option_parse_scope),
>
> ...whose callback parses the string arg into a 'restrict_scope'
> boolean/enum/something. Then, wherever in 'ls-files' a tree or the index are
> iterated over, you can gate the per-file operation on:
>
> if (!restrict_scope || path_in_sparse_checkout(<path>, istate)) {
> /* do something with <path> */
> }
>
> Note that you should use 'path_in_sparse_checkout()', *not* the
> internal/private function 'path_in_sparse_checkout_1()'; you also don't need
> to explicitly 'init_sparse_checkout_patterns()'. Regardless of whether you
> specified custom patterns or are using the ones in
> '.git/info/sparse-checkout', 'path_in_sparse_checkout()' will initialize &
> use the appropriate patterns.
>
Yeah. And I wouldn't need the refactor of 'path_in_sparse_checkout_1()'.
Thanks a lot (again) for the pointers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-26 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 17:01 [PATCH] ls-tree: add --sparse-filter-oid argument William Sprent via GitGitGadget
2023-01-13 14:17 ` Eric Sunshine
2023-01-13 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-16 15:13 ` William Sprent
2023-01-16 12:14 ` William Sprent
2023-01-23 11:46 ` [PATCH v2] " William Sprent via GitGitGadget
2023-01-23 13:00 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-01-24 15:30 ` William Sprent
2023-01-23 13:06 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-01-24 15:30 ` William Sprent
2023-01-24 20:11 ` Victoria Dye
2023-01-25 13:47 ` William Sprent
2023-01-25 18:32 ` Victoria Dye
2023-01-26 14:55 ` William Sprent [this message]
2023-01-25 5:11 ` Elijah Newren
2023-01-25 16:16 ` William Sprent
2023-01-26 3:25 ` Elijah Newren
2023-01-27 11:58 ` William Sprent
2023-01-28 16:45 ` Elijah Newren
2023-01-30 15:28 ` William Sprent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d96e6ab4-2302-5326-3a0e-bffecc24a295@unity3d.com \
--to=williams@unity3d.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).