From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6D51F5AE for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 07:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230224AbhEaHzD (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 03:55:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39502 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230070AbhEaHyz (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 03:54:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2125C061574 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 00:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id h12-20020a17090aa88cb029016400fd8ad8so1490705pjq.3 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 00:53:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kQOhrnkOFLjtj05XWu1i43zS1QPJed8wLetR93Us8Yw=; b=gTrYloJnWxa1BFHJvX4n9LAT1I5sbsDoI+sdkQw4R/CG7f5h71pGQA274LA4QOy0mo zeLmC8GoHZdfMh5xDVBn4HJAAaE18ucZXGyiAqcPRyOHpzcskJVbWUD/Ewidmgu+GvaT RMBvFBKguI/H1LpO4IvhZw31h4DlFz5bNEcEzbF6Kmn9UEEo9uPampIbe3XzIbx+qZSR rTpXKYfp79GCGPAbhdcrMdeXVYlpQszA2GFlGGoow67FhZad26SE2ghXRYCA9JjZ37Iq gNc0WsELWG7tOHngJZbOGpLqb6bWU1wULrrtFZnDVgy9OVWGeFgCaYDhpuXmvnd6Ix64 +YZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kQOhrnkOFLjtj05XWu1i43zS1QPJed8wLetR93Us8Yw=; b=fSGnQtfctK6xlsX2fcT4pgF4B1lHEcCO+iimuq7/8WBGrAAYZ4DLh5KQ8qWLUlg3YN 8tTAcvOrjQU6MqotikkM02TMkBtw9gxQlVLBy4EYMYJEPD9NisQ+ctYs1fxFP/57ICyu wYzer9XUdhbOra7l9QZge9L8zNKlEG/nBpTTMfGWAyH/2JWHZAq4lzIoph/x7OhpeBhO 9c9ofON/Vp+fz6cOZFt8gI86H6EnOaEYFXapsa9tXbhF5B7/Cgqf+AZwkIqsnmkWncQm qcMdwEr+U7IaSQ+9V1im0wN2iSN0prRT2STXVBn4JRWHxWJ/GtnRzHYiKOT5G0y0BDfS Gp8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qvDe5AG5t/E9JaKYf+gtYr510+VnI7oNstfBigKX28oe9HhEO 9mSTWIVlL14znxTUPzU3xdakQjBhGdZEIg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxphdPWj/505Rw8HF1A4FHgAomAOxB6gXMa4SHgZ8REIMVPSnMCuttskI+fPyP4/WnTiyDZg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9b8b:b029:ee:bb74:7d46 with SMTP id y11-20020a1709029b8bb02900eebb747d46mr19463386plp.65.1622447594215; Mon, 31 May 2021 00:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs03-180-214-233-67.three.co.id. [180.214.233.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c190sm1558898pfc.26.2021.05.31.00.53.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 May 2021 00:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [BUG] gitk error - can't read "arcnos()": no such element in array To: Chris Packham Cc: GIT References: From: Bagas Sanjaya Message-ID: Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 14:53:11 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 31/05/21 14.38, Chris Packham wrote: >> Is your problematic repo public? If so, we can test against that. >> > > Unfortunately not. It's actually an internal kernel tree which has a > different root to upstream (hence using git replace to attach upstream). > All of which make the history a bit funky. > > I don't know if the problem will survive anonymisation but I can try. > Did you mean vendor kernel tree based on Linux kernel? I think you can try reproducing the issue with either Linus' tree [1] (mainline only) or Greg's stable tree [2] (mainline + release branches and tags). [1]: https://github.com/torvalds/linux [2]: https://github.com/gregkh/linux -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara