git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all()
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 20:53:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6598312-00ba-9ec0-1f67-2b3977d7e308@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh7r4uhrn.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

Hi Junio,

Le 09/10/2020 à 06:48, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> diff --git a/merge-strategies.c b/merge-strategies.c
>> index bbe6f48698..f0e30f5624 100644
>> --- a/merge-strategies.c
>> +++ b/merge-strategies.c
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>>  #include "dir.h"
>>  #include "ll-merge.h"
>>  #include "merge-strategies.h"
>> +#include "run-command.h"
>>  #include "xdiff-interface.h"
>>  
>>  static int add_to_index_cacheinfo(struct index_state *istate,
>> @@ -212,3 +213,101 @@ int merge_strategies_one_file(struct repository *r,
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> +
>> +int merge_program_cb(const struct object_id *orig_blob,
>> +		     const struct object_id *our_blob,
>> +		     const struct object_id *their_blob, const char *path,
>> +		     unsigned int orig_mode, unsigned int our_mode, unsigned int their_mode,
>> +		     void *data)
>> +{
>> +	char ownbuf[3][GIT_MAX_HEXSZ] = {{0}};
>> +	const char *arguments[] = { (char *)data, "", "", "", path,
>> +				    ownbuf[0], ownbuf[1], ownbuf[2],
>> +				    NULL };
>> +
>> +	if (orig_blob)
>> +		arguments[1] = oid_to_hex(orig_blob);
>> +	if (our_blob)
>> +		arguments[2] = oid_to_hex(our_blob);
>> +	if (their_blob)
>> +		arguments[3] = oid_to_hex(their_blob);
> 
> oid_to_hex() uses 4-slot rotating buffer, no?  Relying on the fact
> that three would be available here without getting reused (or,
> rather, our caller didn't make its own calls and/or does not mind
> us invalidating all but one slot for them) feels a bit iffy.
> 
> Extending ownbuf[] to 6 elements and using oid_to_hex_r() would be a
> trivial way to clarify the code.
> 
>> +	xsnprintf(ownbuf[0], sizeof(ownbuf[0]), "%o", orig_mode);
>> +	xsnprintf(ownbuf[1], sizeof(ownbuf[1]), "%o", our_mode);
>> +	xsnprintf(ownbuf[2], sizeof(ownbuf[2]), "%o", their_mode);
> 
> And these mode bits would not need GIT_MAX_HEXSZ to begin with.
> This smells like a WIP that hasn't been carefullly proofread.
> 
> 	char oidbuf[3][GIT_MAX_HEXSZ] = { 0 };
> 	char modebuf[3][8] = { 0 };

So here I picked GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1 and 10 for those buffers, they are
already used by builtin/diff.c.

> 	char *args[] = {
> 		data, oidbuf[0], oidbuf[1], oidbuf[2], path,
> 		modebuf[0], modebuf[1], modebuf[2], NULL,
> 	};
>         
>         if (orig_blob)
> 		oid_to_hex_r(oidbuf[0], orig_blob);
> 	...
> 	xsnprintf(modebuf[0], ...);
> 
> 
> Eh, wait.  Is this meant to be able to drive "git-merge-one-file",
> i.e. a missing common/ours/theirs is indicated by an empty string
> in both oiod and mode?  If so, an unconditional xsnprintf() would
> either give garbage or "0" at best, neither of which is an empty
> string.  So the body would be more like
> 
> 	if (orig_blob) {
> 		oid_to_hex_r(oidbuf[0], orig_blob);
> 		xsnprintf(modebuf[0], "%o", orig_mode);
> 	}
> 	if (our_blob) {
> 		oid_to_hex_r(oidbuf[1], our_blob);
> 		xsnprintf(modebuf[1], "%o", our_mode);
> 	}
> 	...
> 
> wouldn't it?
> 

Yes, especially since you suggested to error out if an empty oid has a
non-empty mode in the second patch.

>> +	return run_command_v_opt(arguments, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int merge_entry(struct index_state *istate, int quiet, int pos,
>> +		       const char *path, merge_cb cb, void *data)
> 
> When we use an identifier "cb", it typically means callback data,
> not a callback function which is often called "fn".  So, name the
> type "merge_fn" (or "merge_func"), and call the parameter "fn".
> 
>> +{
>> +	int found = 0;
>> +	const struct object_id *oids[3] = {NULL};
>> +	unsigned int modes[3] = {0};
>> +
>> +	do {
>> +		const struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[pos];
>> +		int stage = ce_stage(ce);
>> +
>> +		if (strcmp(ce->name, path))
>> +			break;
>> +		found++;
>> +		oids[stage - 1] = &ce->oid;
>> +		modes[stage - 1] = ce->ce_mode;
>> +	} while (++pos < istate->cache_nr);
>> +	if (!found)
>> +		return error(_("%s is not in the cache"), path);
>> +
>> +	if (cb(oids[0], oids[1], oids[2], path, modes[0], modes[1], modes[2], data)) {
>> +		if (!quiet)
>> +			error(_("Merge program failed"));
>> +		return -2;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return found;
>> +}
> 
> This copies from builtin/merge-index.c::merge_entry().
> 
>> +int merge_one_path(struct index_state *istate, int oneshot, int quiet,
>> +		   const char *path, merge_cb cb, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	int pos = index_name_pos(istate, path, strlen(path)), ret;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If it already exists in the cache as stage0, it's
>> +	 * already merged and there is nothing to do.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (pos < 0) {
>> +		ret = merge_entry(istate, quiet, -pos - 1, path, cb, data);
>> +		if (ret == -1)
>> +			return -1;
>> +		else if (ret == -2)
>> +			return 1;
>> +	}
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> Likewise from the same function in that file.
> 
> Are we removing the "git merge-index" program?  Reusing the same
> identifier for these copied-and-pasted pairs of functions bothers
> me for two reasons.
> 
>  - An indentifier that was clear and unique enough in the original
>    context as a file-scope static may not be a good name as a global
>    identifier.  
> 
>  - Having two similar-looking functions with the same name makes
>    reading and learning the codebase starting at "git grep" hits
>    more difficult than necessary.
> 

I don't plan to remove `git merge-index' -- nor any other program, for
that matter.  Why not renaming merge_one_path() and merge_all(),
merge_index_path() and merge_all_index()?

>> +int merge_all(struct index_state *istate, int oneshot, int quiet,
>> +	      merge_cb cb, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	int err = 0, i, ret;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
>> +		const struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[i];
>> +		if (!ce_stage(ce))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		ret = merge_entry(istate, quiet, i, ce->name, cb, data);
>> +		if (ret > 0)
>> +			i += ret - 1;
>> +		else if (ret == -1)
>> +			return -1;
>> +		else if (ret == -2) {
>> +			if (oneshot)
>> +				err++;
>> +			else
>> +				return 1;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return err;
>> +}
> 
> Likewise.
> 
>> diff --git a/merge-strategies.h b/merge-strategies.h
>> index b527d145c7..cf78d7eaf4 100644
>> --- a/merge-strategies.h
>> +++ b/merge-strategies.h
>> @@ -10,4 +10,21 @@ int merge_strategies_one_file(struct repository *r,
>>  			      unsigned int orig_mode, unsigned int our_mode,
>>  			      unsigned int their_mode);
>>  
>> +typedef int (*merge_cb)(const struct object_id *orig_blob,
>> +			const struct object_id *our_blob,
>> +			const struct object_id *their_blob, const char *path,
>> +			unsigned int orig_mode, unsigned int our_mode, unsigned int their_mode,
>> +			void *data);
> 
> Call it "merge_one_file_func", probably.
> 
>> +int merge_program_cb(const struct object_id *orig_blob,
> 
> Call it spawn_merge_one_file() perhaps?
> 
>> +		     const struct object_id *our_blob,
>> +		     const struct object_id *their_blob, const char *path,
>> +		     unsigned int orig_mode, unsigned int our_mode, unsigned int their_mode,
>> +		     void *data);
>> +
>> +int merge_one_path(struct index_state *istate, int oneshot, int quiet,
>> +		   const char *path, merge_cb cb, void *data);
>> +int merge_all(struct index_state *istate, int oneshot, int quiet,
>> +	      merge_cb cb, void *data);
>>  #endif /* MERGE_STRATEGIES_H */

Ack for the rest, the two function names are the only thing I am still
missing on this patch right now.

Alban


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 156+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-25 12:19 [RFC PATCH v1 00/17] Rewrite the remaining merge strategies from shell to C Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/17] t6027: modernise tests Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/17] merge-one-file: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 14:55   ` Chris Torek
2020-06-25 15:16   ` Phillip Wood
2020-06-25 18:17     ` Phillip Wood
2020-06-26 14:33       ` Phillip Wood
2020-07-12 11:22     ` Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/17] merge-one-file: remove calls to external processes Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/17] merge-one-file: use error() instead of fprintf(stderr, ...) Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/17] merge-one-file: libify merge_one_file() Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/17] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all() Alban Gruin
2020-06-26 10:13   ` Phillip Wood
2020-06-26 14:32     ` Phillip Wood
2020-07-12 11:36     ` Alban Gruin
2020-07-12 18:02       ` Phillip Wood
2020-07-12 20:10         ` Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/17] merge-resolve: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/17] merge-resolve: remove calls to external processes Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/17] merge-resolve: libify merge_resolve() Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/17] merge-recursive: move better_branch_name() to merge.c Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/17] merge-octopus: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/17] merge-octopus: remove calls to external processes Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/17] merge-octopus: libify merge_octopus() Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/17] merge: use the "resolve" strategy without forking Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/17] merge: use the "octopus" " Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/17] sequencer: use the "resolve" " Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 16:11   ` Phillip Wood
2020-07-12 11:27     ` Alban Gruin
2020-06-25 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/17] sequencer: use the "octopus" merge " Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Rewrite the remaining merge strategies from shell to C Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:56   ` [PATCH v2 01/11] t6027: modernise tests Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:56   ` [PATCH v2 02/11] merge-one-file: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 21:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-02 14:50       ` Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:56   ` [PATCH v2 03/11] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all() Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 21:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-02 15:37       ` Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:56   ` [PATCH v2 04/11] merge-index: don't fork if the requested program is `git-merge-one-file' Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:56   ` [PATCH v2 05/11] merge-resolve: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:57   ` [PATCH v2 06/11] merge-recursive: move better_branch_name() to merge.c Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:57   ` [PATCH v2 07/11] merge-octopus: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:57   ` [PATCH v2 08/11] merge: use the "resolve" strategy without forking Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:57   ` [PATCH v2 09/11] merge: use the "octopus" " Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:57   ` [PATCH v2 10/11] sequencer: use the "resolve" " Alban Gruin
2020-09-01 10:57   ` [PATCH v2 11/11] sequencer: use the "octopus" merge " Alban Gruin
2020-10-05 12:26   ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Rewrite the remaining merge strategies from shell to C Alban Gruin
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 01/11] t6027: modernise tests Alban Gruin
2020-10-06 20:50       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 02/11] merge-one-file: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-10-06 22:01       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-21 19:47         ` Alban Gruin
2020-10-21 20:28           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-21 21:20             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-21 20:30           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 03/11] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all() Alban Gruin
2020-10-09  4:48       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-06 19:53         ` Alban Gruin [this message]
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 04/11] merge-index: don't fork if the requested program is `git-merge-one-file' Alban Gruin
2020-10-16 19:07       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 05/11] merge-resolve: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-10-16 19:19       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-06 19:53         ` Alban Gruin
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 06/11] merge-recursive: move better_branch_name() to merge.c Alban Gruin
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 07/11] merge-octopus: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 08/11] merge: use the "resolve" strategy without forking Alban Gruin
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 09/11] merge: use the "octopus" " Alban Gruin
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 10/11] sequencer: use the "resolve" " Alban Gruin
2020-10-05 12:26     ` [PATCH v3 11/11] sequencer: use the "octopus" merge " Alban Gruin
2020-10-07  6:57     ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Rewrite the remaining merge strategies from shell to C Johannes Schindelin
2020-11-13 11:04     ` [PATCH v4 00/12] " Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 01/12] t6027: modernise tests Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 02/12] update-index: move add_cacheinfo() to read-cache.c Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 03/12] merge-one-file: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 04/12] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all() Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 05/12] merge-index: don't fork if the requested program is `git-merge-one-file' Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 06/12] merge-resolve: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 07/12] merge-recursive: move better_branch_name() to merge.c Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 08/12] merge-octopus: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 09/12] merge: use the "resolve" strategy without forking Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 10/12] merge: use the "octopus" " Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 11/12] sequencer: use the "resolve" " Alban Gruin
2020-11-13 11:04       ` [PATCH v4 12/12] sequencer: use the "octopus" merge " Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21       ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Rewrite the remaining merge strategies from shell to C Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 01/12] t6027: modernise tests Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 02/12] update-index: move add_cacheinfo() to read-cache.c Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 03/12] merge-one-file: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 04/12] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all() Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 05/12] merge-index: don't fork if the requested program is `git-merge-one-file' Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 06/12] merge-resolve: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 07/12] merge-recursive: move better_branch_name() to merge.c Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 08/12] merge-octopus: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 09/12] merge: use the "resolve" strategy without forking Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 10/12] merge: use the "octopus" " Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 11/12] sequencer: use the "resolve" " Alban Gruin
2020-11-16 10:21         ` [PATCH v5 12/12] sequencer: use the "octopus" merge " Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53         ` [PATCH v6 00/13] Rewrite the remaining merge strategies from shell to C Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 01/13] t6407: modernise tests Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 02/13] t6060: modify multiple files to expose a possible issue with merge-index Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 03/13] update-index: move add_cacheinfo() to read-cache.c Alban Gruin
2020-12-22 20:54             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 04/13] merge-one-file: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-12-22 21:36             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-03 22:41               ` Alban Gruin
2021-01-08  6:54                 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 05/13] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all() Alban Gruin
2021-01-05 15:59             ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-05 23:20               ` Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 06/13] merge-index: don't fork if the requested program is `git-merge-one-file' Alban Gruin
2021-01-05 16:11             ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-05 17:35               ` Martin Ågren
2021-01-05 23:20                 ` Alban Gruin
2021-01-05 23:20               ` Alban Gruin
2021-01-06  2:04                 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-10 17:15                   ` Alban Gruin
2021-01-10 20:51                     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-08 20:32                       ` Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 07/13] merge-resolve: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 08/13] merge-recursive: move better_branch_name() to merge.c Alban Gruin
2021-01-05 16:19             ` Derrick Stolee
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 09/13] merge-octopus: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2021-01-05 16:40             ` Derrick Stolee
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 10/13] merge: use the "resolve" strategy without forking Alban Gruin
2021-01-05 16:45             ` Derrick Stolee
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 11/13] merge: use the "octopus" " Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 12/13] sequencer: use the "resolve" " Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 11:53           ` [PATCH v6 13/13] sequencer: use the "octopus" merge " Alban Gruin
2020-11-24 19:34           ` [PATCH v6 00/13] Rewrite the remaining merge strategies from shell to C SZEDER Gábor
2021-01-05 16:50           ` Derrick Stolee
2021-03-17 20:49           ` [PATCH v7 00/15] " Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 01/15] t6407: modernise tests Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 02/15] t6060: modify multiple files to expose a possible issue with merge-index Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 03/15] t6060: add tests for removed files Alban Gruin
2021-03-22 21:36               ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-03-23 20:43                 ` Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 04/15] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all() Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 05/15] merge-index: drop the index Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 06/15] merge-index: add a new way to invoke `git-merge-one-file' Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 07/15] update-index: move add_cacheinfo() to read-cache.c Alban Gruin
2021-03-22 21:59               ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-03-23 20:45                 ` Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 08/15] merge-one-file: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2021-03-22 22:20               ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-03-23 20:53                 ` Alban Gruin
2021-03-24  9:10                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-04-10 14:17                     ` Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 09/15] merge-resolve: " Alban Gruin
2021-03-23 22:21               ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-04-10 14:17                 ` Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 10/15] merge-recursive: move better_branch_name() to merge.c Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 11/15] merge-octopus: rewrite in C Alban Gruin
2021-03-23 23:58               ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 12/15] merge: use the "resolve" strategy without forking Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 13/15] merge: use the "octopus" " Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 14/15] sequencer: use the "resolve" " Alban Gruin
2021-03-17 20:49             ` [PATCH v7 15/15] sequencer: use the "octopus" merge " Alban Gruin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6598312-00ba-9ec0-1f67-2b3977d7e308@gmail.com \
    --to=alban.gruin@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).