From: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>,
jeffhost@microsoft.com, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:22:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d56a60a8-e735-b147-a2e6-4e48461ad701@jeffhostetler.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh8p2d8jh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On 3/26/2018 1:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com> writes:
>
>> I defined that routine to take a uint64_t because I wanted to
>> pass a nanosecond value received from getnanotime() and that's
>> what it returns.
>
> Hmph, but the target format does not have different representation
> of inttypes in different sizes, no?
>
> I personally doubt that we would benefit from having a group of
> functions (i.e. format_int{8,16,32,64}_to_json()) that callers have
> to choose from, depending on the exact size of the integer they want
> to serialize. The de-serializing side would be the same story.
>
> Even if the variable a potential caller of the formetter is a sized
> type that is different from uintmax_t, the caller shouldn't have to
> add an extra cast.
>
> Am I missing some obvious merit for having these separate functions
> for explicit sizes?
>
I did the uint64_t for the unsigned ns times.
I did the other one for the usual signed ints.
I could convert them both to a single signed 64 bit typed function
if we only want to have one function.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-26 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-23 4:39 [RFC PATCH v4] rebase-interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-23 4:39 ` [RFC PATCH v4] rebase-interactive: Simplify pick_on_preserving_merges Wink Saville
2018-03-23 17:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-03-23 4:39 ` [RFC PATCH v4] rebase: Update invocation of rebase dot-sourced scripts Wink Saville
2018-03-23 6:26 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-23 21:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-23 21:18 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-23 17:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-03-23 19:06 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-23 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-23 21:05 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-23 21:34 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-23 22:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-23 22:54 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-24 5:36 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-26 15:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-26 17:01 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-03-26 17:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-26 18:22 ` Jeff Hostetler [this message]
2018-03-27 5:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-27 10:03 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-03-26 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-26 18:33 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-03-26 18:43 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-26 19:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-26 22:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-03-23 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/8] rebase-interactive: simplify pick_on_preserving_merges Wink Saville
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/8] rebase: update invocation of rebase dot-sourced scripts Wink Saville
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/8] Indent function git_rebase__interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-23 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-23 22:52 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-23 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-24 0:01 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] Extract functions out of git_rebase__interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-23 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-24 7:20 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 5/8] Add and use git_rebase__interactive__preserve_merges Wink Saville
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 6/8] Remove unused code paths from git_rebase__interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 7/8] Remove unused code paths from git_rebase__interactive__preserve_merges Wink Saville
2018-03-23 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v5 8/8] Remove merges_option and a blank line Wink Saville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d56a60a8-e735-b147-a2e6-4e48461ad701@jeffhostetler.com \
--to=git@jeffhostetler.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=wink@saville.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).