From: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: phillip.wood123@gmail.com, linusa@google.com,
calvinwan@google.com, gitster@pobox.com, rsbecker@nexbridge.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:21:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1696889529.git.steadmon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0169ce6fb9ccafc089b74ae406db0d1a8ff8ac65.1688165272.git.steadmon@google.com>
In our current testing environment, we spend a significant amount of
effort crafting end-to-end tests for error conditions that could easily
be captured by unit tests (or we simply forgo some hard-to-setup and
rare error conditions). Unit tests additionally provide stability to the
codebase and can simplify debugging through isolation. Turning parts of
Git into libraries[1] gives us the ability to run unit tests on the
libraries and to write unit tests in C. Writing unit tests in pure C,
rather than with our current shell/test-tool helper setup, simplifies
test setup, simplifies passing data around (no shell-isms required), and
reduces testing runtime by not spawning a separate process for every
test invocation.
This series begins with a project document covering our goals for adding
unit tests and a discussion of alternative frameworks considered, as
well as the features used to evaluate them. A rendered preview of this
doc can be found at [2]. It also adds Phillip Wood's TAP implemenation
(with some slightly re-worked Makefile rules) and a sample strbuf unit
test. Finally, we modify the configs for GitHub and Cirrus CI to run the
unit tests. Sample runs showing successful CI runs can be found at [3],
[4], and [5].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAJoAoZ=Cig_kLocxKGax31sU7Xe4==BGzC__Bg2_pr7krNq6MA@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://github.com/steadmon/git/blob/unit-tests-asciidoc/Documentation/technical/unit-tests.adoc
[3] https://github.com/steadmon/git/actions/runs/5884659246/job/15959781385#step:4:1803
[4] https://github.com/steadmon/git/actions/runs/5884659246/job/15959938401#step:5:186
[5] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6126304366428160 (unrelated tests failed,
but note that t-strbuf ran successfully)
In addition to reviewing the patches in this series, reviewers can help
this series progress by chiming in on these remaining TODOs:
- Figure out if we should split t-basic.c into multiple meta-tests, to
avoid merge conflicts and changes to expected text in
t0080-unit-test-output.sh.
- Figure out if we should de-duplicate assertions in t-strbuf.c at the
cost of making tests less self-contained and diagnostic output less
helpful.
- Figure out if we should collect unit tests statistics similar to the
"counts" files for shell tests
- Decide if it's OK to wait on sharding unit tests across "sliced" CI
instances
- Provide guidelines for writing new unit tests
Changes in v8:
- Flipped return values for TEST, TEST_TODO, and check_* macros &
functions. This makes it easier to reason about control flow for
patterns like:
if (check(some_condition)) { ... }
- Moved unit test binaries to t/unit-tests/bin to simplify .gitignore
patterns.
- Removed testing of some strbuf implementation details in t-strbuf.c
Josh Steadmon (2):
unit tests: Add a project plan document
ci: run unit tests in CI
Phillip Wood (1):
unit tests: add TAP unit test framework
.cirrus.yml | 2 +-
Documentation/Makefile | 1 +
Documentation/technical/unit-tests.txt | 220 +++++++++++++++++
Makefile | 28 ++-
ci/run-build-and-tests.sh | 2 +
ci/run-test-slice.sh | 5 +
t/Makefile | 15 +-
t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh | 58 +++++
t/unit-tests/.gitignore | 1 +
t/unit-tests/t-basic.c | 95 +++++++
t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c | 120 +++++++++
t/unit-tests/test-lib.c | 329 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
t/unit-tests/test-lib.h | 143 +++++++++++
13 files changed, 1014 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/technical/unit-tests.txt
create mode 100755 t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/.gitignore
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/t-basic.c
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/test-lib.h
Range-diff against v7:
-: ---------- > 1: 81c5148a12 unit tests: Add a project plan document
1: 3cc98d4045 ! 2: 00d3c95a81 unit tests: add TAP unit test framework
@@ Commit message
check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
check_uint(buf.alloc, ==, 0);
- if (check(buf.buf == strbuf_slopbuf))
- return; /* avoid SIGSEV */
check_char(buf.buf[0], ==, '\0');
}
@@ Commit message
checked by t0080-unit-test-output.sh. t-strbuf.c shows some example
unit tests for strbuf.c
- The unit tests can be built with "make unit-tests" (this works but the
- Makefile changes need some further work). Once they have been built they
- can be run manually (e.g t/unit-tests/t-strbuf) or with prove.
+ The unit tests will be built as part of the default "make all" target,
+ to avoid bitrot. If you wish to build just the unit tests, you can run
+ "make build-unit-tests". To run the tests, you can use "make unit-tests"
+ or run the test binaries directly, as in "./t/unit-tests/bin/t-strbuf".
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
@@ Makefile: TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS =
THIRD_PARTY_SOURCES =
+UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS =
+UNIT_TEST_DIR = t/unit-tests
++UNIT_TEST_BIN = $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/bin
# Having this variable in your environment would break pipelines because
# you cause "cd" to echo its destination to stdout. It can also take
@@ Makefile: THIRD_PARTY_SOURCES += compat/regex/%
+UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-basic
+UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-strbuf
-+UNIT_TEST_PROGS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%$X,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
++UNIT_TEST_PROGS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_BIN)/%$X,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
+UNIT_TEST_OBJS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
+UNIT_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/test-lib.o
+
@@ Makefile: $(FUZZ_PROGRAMS): all
fuzz-all: $(FUZZ_PROGRAMS)
+
-+$(UNIT_TEST_PROGS): $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%$X: $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/test-lib.o $(GITLIBS) GIT-LDFLAGS
++$(UNIT_TEST_BIN):
++ @mkdir -p $(UNIT_TEST_BIN)
++
++$(UNIT_TEST_PROGS): $(UNIT_TEST_BIN)/%$X: $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/test-lib.o $(GITLIBS) GIT-LDFLAGS $(UNIT_TEST_BIN)
+ $(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) $(ALL_CFLAGS) -o $@ $(ALL_LDFLAGS) \
+ $(filter %.o,$^) $(filter %.a,$^) $(LIBS)
+
@@ t/Makefile: TPERF = $(sort $(wildcard perf/p[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh))
TINTEROP = $(sort $(wildcard interop/i[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh))
CHAINLINTTESTS = $(sort $(patsubst chainlint/%.test,%,$(wildcard chainlint/*.test)))
CHAINLINT = '$(PERL_PATH_SQ)' chainlint.pl
-+UNIT_TESTS = $(sort $(filter-out %.h %.c %.o unit-tests/t-basic%,$(wildcard unit-tests/*)))
++UNIT_TESTS = $(sort $(filter-out unit-tests/bin/t-basic%,$(wildcard unit-tests/bin/t-*)))
# `test-chainlint` (which is a dependency of `test-lint`, `test` and `prove`)
# checks all tests in all scripts via a single invocation, so tell individual
@@ t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh (new)
+test_expect_success 'TAP output from unit tests' '
+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+ ok 1 - passing test
-+ ok 2 - passing test and assertion return 0
++ ok 2 - passing test and assertion return 1
+ # check "1 == 2" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:76
+ # left: 1
+ # right: 2
+ not ok 3 - failing test
-+ ok 4 - failing test and assertion return -1
++ ok 4 - failing test and assertion return 0
+ not ok 5 - passing TEST_TODO() # TODO
-+ ok 6 - passing TEST_TODO() returns 0
++ ok 6 - passing TEST_TODO() returns 1
+ # todo check ${SQ}check(x)${SQ} succeeded at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:25
+ not ok 7 - failing TEST_TODO()
-+ ok 8 - failing TEST_TODO() returns -1
++ ok 8 - failing TEST_TODO() returns 0
+ # check "0" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:30
+ # skipping test - missing prerequisite
+ # skipping check ${SQ}1${SQ} at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:32
+ ok 9 - test_skip() # SKIP
-+ ok 10 - skipped test returns 0
++ ok 10 - skipped test returns 1
+ # skipping test - missing prerequisite
+ ok 11 - test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() # SKIP
-+ ok 12 - test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() returns 0
++ ok 12 - test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() returns 1
+ # check "0" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:48
+ not ok 13 - TEST_TODO() after failing check
-+ ok 14 - TEST_TODO() after failing check returns -1
++ ok 14 - TEST_TODO() after failing check returns 0
+ # check "0" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:56
+ not ok 15 - failing check after TEST_TODO()
-+ ok 16 - failing check after TEST_TODO() returns -1
++ ok 16 - failing check after TEST_TODO() returns 0
+ # check "!strcmp("\thello\\\\", "there\"\n")" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:61
+ # left: "\011hello\\\\"
+ # right: "there\"\012"
@@ t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh (new)
+ not ok 17 - messages from failing string and char comparison
+ # BUG: test has no checks at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:91
+ not ok 18 - test with no checks
-+ ok 19 - test with no checks returns -1
++ ok 19 - test with no checks returns 0
+ 1..19
+ EOF
+
-+ ! "$GIT_BUILD_DIR"/t/unit-tests/t-basic >actual &&
++ ! "$GIT_BUILD_DIR"/t/unit-tests/bin/t-basic >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
@@ t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh (new)
## t/unit-tests/.gitignore (new) ##
@@
-+/t-basic
-+/t-strbuf
++/bin
## t/unit-tests/t-basic.c (new) ##
@@
@@ t/unit-tests/t-basic.c (new)
+static int do_skip(void)
+{
+ test_skip("missing prerequisite");
-+ return 0;
++ return 1;
+}
+
+static void t_skip_todo(void)
@@ t/unit-tests/t-basic.c (new)
+int cmd_main(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
+ test_res = TEST(check_res = check_int(1, ==, 1), "passing test");
-+ TEST(t_res(0), "passing test and assertion return 0");
++ TEST(t_res(1), "passing test and assertion return 1");
+ test_res = TEST(check_res = check_int(1, ==, 2), "failing test");
-+ TEST(t_res(-1), "failing test and assertion return -1");
++ TEST(t_res(0), "failing test and assertion return 0");
+ test_res = TEST(t_todo(0), "passing TEST_TODO()");
-+ TEST(t_res(0), "passing TEST_TODO() returns 0");
++ TEST(t_res(1), "passing TEST_TODO() returns 1");
+ test_res = TEST(t_todo(1), "failing TEST_TODO()");
-+ TEST(t_res(-1), "failing TEST_TODO() returns -1");
++ TEST(t_res(0), "failing TEST_TODO() returns 0");
+ test_res = TEST(t_skip(), "test_skip()");
-+ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 0), "skipped test returns 0");
++ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 1), "skipped test returns 1");
+ test_res = TEST(t_skip_todo(), "test_skip() inside TEST_TODO()");
-+ TEST(t_res(0), "test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() returns 0");
++ TEST(t_res(1), "test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() returns 1");
+ test_res = TEST(t_todo_after_fail(), "TEST_TODO() after failing check");
-+ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, -1), "TEST_TODO() after failing check returns -1");
++ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 0), "TEST_TODO() after failing check returns 0");
+ test_res = TEST(t_fail_after_todo(), "failing check after TEST_TODO()");
-+ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, -1), "failing check after TEST_TODO() returns -1");
++ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 0), "failing check after TEST_TODO() returns 0");
+ TEST(t_messages(), "messages from failing string and char comparison");
+ test_res = TEST(t_empty(), "test with no checks");
-+ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, -1), "test with no checks returns -1");
++ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 0), "test with no checks returns 0");
+
+ return test_done();
+}
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+#include "test-lib.h"
+#include "strbuf.h"
+
-+/* wrapper that supplies tests with an initialized strbuf */
++/* wrapper that supplies tests with an empty, initialized strbuf */
+static void setup(void (*f)(struct strbuf*, void*), void *data)
+{
+ struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+ strbuf_release(&buf);
+ check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
+ check_uint(buf.alloc, ==, 0);
-+ check(buf.buf == strbuf_slopbuf);
-+ check_char(buf.buf[0], ==, '\0');
++}
++
++/* wrapper that supplies tests with a populated, initialized strbuf */
++static void setup_populated(void (*f)(struct strbuf*, void*), char *init_str, void *data)
++{
++ struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
++
++ strbuf_addstr(&buf, init_str);
++ check_uint(buf.len, ==, strlen(init_str));
++ f(&buf, data);
++ strbuf_release(&buf);
++ check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
++ check_uint(buf.alloc, ==, 0);
++}
++
++static int assert_sane_strbuf(struct strbuf *buf)
++{
++ /* Initialized strbufs should always have a non-NULL buffer */
++ if (buf->buf == NULL)
++ return 0;
++ /* Buffers should always be NUL-terminated */
++ if (buf->buf[buf->len] != '\0')
++ return 0;
++ /*
++ * Freshly-initialized strbufs may not have a dynamically allocated
++ * buffer
++ */
++ if (buf->len == 0 && buf->alloc == 0)
++ return 1;
++ /* alloc must be at least one byte larger than len */
++ return buf->len + 1 <= buf->alloc;
+}
+
+static void t_static_init(void)
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+
+ check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
+ check_uint(buf.alloc, ==, 0);
-+ if (check(buf.buf == strbuf_slopbuf))
-+ return; /* avoid de-referencing buf.buf */
+ check_char(buf.buf[0], ==, '\0');
+}
+
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+ struct strbuf buf;
+
+ strbuf_init(&buf, 1024);
++ check(assert_sane_strbuf(&buf));
+ check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
+ check_uint(buf.alloc, >=, 1024);
+ check_char(buf.buf[0], ==, '\0');
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+{
+ const char *p_ch = data;
+ const char ch = *p_ch;
++ size_t orig_alloc = buf->alloc;
++ size_t orig_len = buf->len;
+
++ if (!check(assert_sane_strbuf(buf)))
++ return;
+ strbuf_addch(buf, ch);
-+ if (check_uint(buf->len, ==, 1) ||
-+ check_uint(buf->alloc, >, 1))
++ if (!check(assert_sane_strbuf(buf)))
++ return;
++ if (!(check_uint(buf->len, ==, orig_len + 1) &&
++ check_uint(buf->alloc, >=, orig_alloc)))
+ return; /* avoid de-referencing buf->buf */
-+ check_char(buf->buf[0], ==, ch);
-+ check_char(buf->buf[1], ==, '\0');
++ check_char(buf->buf[buf->len - 1], ==, ch);
++ check_char(buf->buf[buf->len], ==, '\0');
+}
+
+static void t_addstr(struct strbuf *buf, void *data)
+{
+ const char *text = data;
+ size_t len = strlen(text);
++ size_t orig_alloc = buf->alloc;
++ size_t orig_len = buf->len;
+
++ if (!check(assert_sane_strbuf(buf)))
++ return;
+ strbuf_addstr(buf, text);
-+ if (check_uint(buf->len, ==, len) ||
-+ check_uint(buf->alloc, >, len) ||
-+ check_char(buf->buf[len], ==, '\0'))
++ if (!check(assert_sane_strbuf(buf)))
++ return;
++ if (!(check_uint(buf->len, ==, orig_len + len) &&
++ check_uint(buf->alloc, >=, orig_alloc) &&
++ check_uint(buf->alloc, >, orig_len + len) &&
++ check_char(buf->buf[orig_len + len], ==, '\0')))
+ return;
-+ check_str(buf->buf, text);
++ check_str(buf->buf + orig_len, text);
+}
+
+int cmd_main(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
-+ if (TEST(t_static_init(), "static initialization works"))
++ if (!TEST(t_static_init(), "static initialization works"))
+ test_skip_all("STRBUF_INIT is broken");
+ TEST(t_dynamic_init(), "dynamic initialization works");
+ TEST(setup(t_addch, "a"), "strbuf_addch adds char");
+ TEST(setup(t_addch, ""), "strbuf_addch adds NUL char");
++ TEST(setup_populated(t_addch, "initial value", "a"),
++ "strbuf_addch appends to initial value");
+ TEST(setup(t_addstr, "hello there"), "strbuf_addstr adds string");
++ TEST(setup_populated(t_addstr, "initial value", "hello there"),
++ "strbuf_addstr appends string to initial value");
+
+ return test_done();
+}
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+ va_end(ap);
+ ctx.running = 0;
+ if (ctx.skip_all)
-+ return 0;
++ return 1;
+ putc('\n', stdout);
+ fflush(stdout);
+ ctx.failed |= ctx.result == RESULT_FAILURE;
+
-+ return -(ctx.result == RESULT_FAILURE);
++ return ctx.result != RESULT_FAILURE;
+}
+
+static void test_fail(void)
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+
+ if (ctx.result == RESULT_SKIP) {
+ test_msg("skipping check '%s' at %s", check, location);
-+ return 0;
++ return 1;
+ } else if (!ctx.todo) {
+ if (ok) {
+ test_pass();
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+ }
+ }
+
-+ return -!ok;
++ return !!ok;
+}
+
+void test__todo_begin(void)
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+
+ ctx.todo = 0;
+ if (ctx.result == RESULT_SKIP)
-+ return 0;
-+ if (!res) {
++ return 1;
++ if (res) {
+ test_msg("todo check '%s' succeeded at %s", check, location);
+ test_fail();
+ } else {
+ test_todo();
+ }
+
-+ return -!res;
++ return !res;
+}
+
+int check_bool_loc(const char *loc, const char *check, int ok)
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+{
+ int ret = test_assert(loc, check, ok);
+
-+ if (ret) {
++ if (!ret) {
+ test_msg(" left: %"PRIdMAX, a);
+ test_msg(" right: %"PRIdMAX, b);
+ }
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+{
+ int ret = test_assert(loc, check, ok);
+
-+ if (ret) {
++ if (!ret) {
+ test_msg(" left: %"PRIuMAX, a);
+ test_msg(" right: %"PRIuMAX, b);
+ }
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+{
+ int ret = test_assert(loc, check, ok);
+
-+ if (ret) {
++ if (!ret) {
+ fflush(stderr);
+ print_char(" left", a);
+ print_char(" right", b);
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+ int ok = (!a && !b) || (a && b && !strcmp(a, b));
+ int ret = test_assert(loc, check, ok);
+
-+ if (ret) {
++ if (!ret) {
+ fflush(stderr);
+ print_str(" left", a);
+ print_str(" right", b);
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.h (new)
+#include "git-compat-util.h"
+
+/*
-+ * Run a test function, returns 0 if the test succeeds, -1 if it
++ * Run a test function, returns 1 if the test succeeds, 0 if it
+ * fails. If test_skip_all() has been called then the test will not be
+ * run. The description for each test should be unique. For example:
+ *
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.h (new)
+void test_msg(const char *format, ...);
+
+/*
-+ * Test checks are built around test_assert(). checks return 0 on
-+ * success, -1 on failure. If any check fails then the test will
++ * Test checks are built around test_assert(). checks return 1 on
++ * success, 0 on failure. If any check fails then the test will
+ * fail. To create a custom check define a function that wraps
+ * test_assert() and a macro to wrap that function. For example:
+ *
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.h (new)
+
+/*
+ * Wrap a check that is known to fail. If the check succeeds then the
-+ * test will fail. Returns 0 if the check fails, -1 if it
++ * test will fail. Returns 1 if the check fails, 0 if it
+ * succeeds. For example:
+ *
+ * TEST_TODO(check(0));
2: abf4dc41ac ! 3: aa1dfa4892 ci: run unit tests in CI
@@ ci/run-test-slice.sh: group "Run tests" make --quiet -C t T="$(cd t &&
+fi
+
check_unignored_build_artifacts
-
- ## t/Makefile ##
-@@ t/Makefile: TPERF = $(sort $(wildcard perf/p[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh))
- TINTEROP = $(sort $(wildcard interop/i[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh))
- CHAINLINTTESTS = $(sort $(patsubst chainlint/%.test,%,$(wildcard chainlint/*.test)))
- CHAINLINT = '$(PERL_PATH_SQ)' chainlint.pl
--UNIT_TESTS = $(sort $(filter-out %.h %.c %.o unit-tests/t-basic%,$(wildcard unit-tests/*)))
-+UNIT_TESTS = $(sort $(filter-out %.h %.c %.o unit-tests/t-basic%,$(wildcard unit-tests/t-*)))
-
- # `test-chainlint` (which is a dependency of `test-lint`, `test` and `prove`)
- # checks all tests in all scripts via a single invocation, so tell individual
base-commit: a9e066fa63149291a55f383cfa113d8bdbdaa6b3
--
2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230517-unit-tests-v2-v2-0-8c1b50f75811@google.com>
2023-06-30 22:51 ` [PATCH v4] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-07-01 0:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-01 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-07 23:07 ` [PATCH v5] " Josh Steadmon
2023-08-14 13:29 ` Phillip Wood
2023-08-15 22:55 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 9:05 ` Phillip Wood
2023-08-16 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Josh Steadmon
2023-08-16 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-08-16 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 0:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 0:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 18:34 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-08-16 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-08-18 0:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-22 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-24 13:57 ` phillip.wood123
2023-09-25 18:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-06 22:58 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-09 17:37 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 20:38 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan Junio C Hamano
2023-08-24 20:11 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-09-13 18:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-09 22:21 ` Josh Steadmon [this message]
2023-10-09 22:21 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-10-10 8:57 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-11 21:14 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-11 23:05 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-11-01 17:31 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-27 20:12 ` Christian Couder
2023-11-01 17:47 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-09 22:21 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-10-11 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-16 13:43 ` [PATCH v8 2.5/3] fixup! " Phillip Wood
2023-10-16 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-11-01 17:54 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-11-01 17:54 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-27 20:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] " Christian Couder
2023-11-01 22:54 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-09 22:21 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
2023-10-09 23:50 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan Junio C Hamano
2023-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] CMake unit test fixups Phillip Wood
2023-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] fixup! cmake: also build unit tests Phillip Wood
2023-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] fixup! artifacts-tar: when including `.dll` files, don't forget the unit-tests Phillip Wood
2023-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] fixup! cmake: handle also unit tests Phillip Wood
2023-10-19 19:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] CMake unit test fixups Junio C Hamano
2023-10-16 10:07 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan phillip.wood123
2023-11-01 23:09 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-27 20:26 ` Christian Couder
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [PATCH v9 " Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-11-03 21:54 ` Christian Couder
2023-11-09 17:51 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
2023-11-09 18:50 ` [PATCH v10 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan Josh Steadmon
2023-11-09 18:50 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-11-09 23:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-11-09 18:50 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-11-09 18:50 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1696889529.git.steadmon@google.com \
--to=steadmon@google.com \
--cc=calvinwan@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=linusa@google.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).