From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A542D201C8 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 20:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751035AbdKLUJg (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 15:09:36 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:61821 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750910AbdKLUJg (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 15:09:36 -0500 Received: from [192.168.178.43] ([92.76.226.11]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MK0ur-1eFM8G30XV-001Rqi; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 21:08:37 +0100 Subject: Re: should "git bisect" support "git bisect next?" To: Junio C Hamano , Christian Couder Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" , Git Mailing list , Pranit Bauva References: From: Stephan Beyer Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 21:08:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pOmsDBMAyZ8pNsT2fIwVQqXu/7M5R32uEgJZA3vbyIxej5N4q0w Kh26stAsFWRV73SzoaupoGV0NxjrgwfJwCzEvgipjOL9GAPyR1BbkSUpI8opld7303AvM6t wb7cACLlNwtgA4A9LhSWnw+W3KJ6AdZiRT+JkBtsT68dIPs170yMtJNsDgv3NAs2rcOq29j KUcvkwbtVOMQiOtFOJ/NA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:tBh4TDel++w=:L0Sw3+C2OqFYKX56LHr7Ur mYDqEXuQhOVz2Pn35Lj8k2V7tyXEv0KhKBdl7X8jk/Nb2ntb81n7NdiB4xpXgRXYua8hQGrnI Lnuyl8mKvztP0F7MISzlJN5xwslEHq9WLps/SZGpe/tuTt8Y8kscqHhC7PJUwPZtyHa3K3dvH qzdUci/ZyareQ8NqwdTGb+cEWudc3icruEPPxbxs5cQIPn+wUkcKFgWKR+J91F8/9jkGrBa/x H+2huvNFRuD2vzc7SyyHwnpEA6uPj5RAfcK8gYBGMUdkvRolkM8nP/2y87Kwi78MIHjOJgnfe 8LEQKC4msZDAcvYFjoYsPb1RZtlWop7IKM+UM5fc3pkzsGYTM4G7osnUl1iWzZDiZrIjMub+U jusJpUBJ+yrmzqynxm0Gg2MMWiy08ouvz5WPGuPRmxwNkvSvOtQOivf46F9irtDgebNhegEhZ XGe4vmMyL2MnEcC+1rmubXMnMAJ1lc5TYiH608dS/YNG0DTeSVWuyYRP8OaY2RJ7P5ls9otmq gCSmwTMRi1QbvV7njGDvKLz4TyW6zlYBsE1g+1oILHlQov3jmGnTIV51Z335NLIeomvmDsxJP 9O8fSXmE9L78bvlSRM5DR22ZjMn3bfzGQMTPlcncZ8twSh4ivj/kGihX/+bkyYO3+O6di9YjH J+xU+OoYA+vYLsZHNc05K7YH745sAhGNxuvrntJK7oQnnJn1n/OTUWGSlmZ5n4WHy5AlTubvb Q96VvBQQTj7+MOgBW8WHgDZ5pLA9ToiFB7hYTGuKaNJpzg13d/EhRR7VvDC4SiyqucJ+YOOXs 7BmuHdJXDuvfC/af8DtPipoyS99Q+iBSMv/rva4bTJ0XVsjoX4= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 11/11/2017 03:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Christian Couder writes: > >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Robert P. J. Day >> wrote: >>> >>> the man page for "git bisect" makes no mention of "git bisect next", >>> but the script git-bisect.sh does: >> >> Yeah the following patch was related: >> >> https://public-inbox.org/git/1460294354-7031-2-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net/ >> >> You might want to discuss with Stephan (cc'ed). > > Thanks for saving me time to explain why 'next' is still a very > important command but the end users do not actually need to be > strongly aware of it, because most commands automatically invokes it > as their final step due to the importance of what it does ;-) I will nonetheless re-roll the patch (that Christian linked to) after Pranit's bisect part II series is in good shape. I think the documentation change in the patch shows why the user should be aware of it (although not strongly). Best Stephan