From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC941F4B4 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726663AbgL3NgY (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2020 08:36:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45180 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726412AbgL3NgY (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2020 08:36:24 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FD2C06179B for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 05:35:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id c14so10929776qtn.0 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 05:35:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fCYsFngI7GIGOAeTmBxr0ya5dVk+ZxGRz7jJBo+Jx30=; b=b7XR2kIBXdw5jFoZ0xzug70i7DCJ3012n7wfRcYmTTkdA6aTehWKGIzWi6YE7FJek4 U8hQNSgPU4OFVO4DSp9ZQU1OTOKPEl3VpmTRpcn/4hEk/BlubpYFrghxlDoZRceOtG4B jYzj9WNhNFHENHWHJbQGAuHiFunxXUj0wy+NbanQC7oeJ5aihWN46/JGcAUQUpaU0vaM ox2eTnf550HXSPNtuYO0xqsFLr2osfkctmyAVjxsgJRzkuR5GH+nvwT6uZ2fOoM3sFna t+TamGhciZbYvRItCbQVmu+uJeE6QiC5nA0ZeMHbdLj7ZhOKCwunZuh/UDWFi+9GWS7N PooA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fCYsFngI7GIGOAeTmBxr0ya5dVk+ZxGRz7jJBo+Jx30=; b=TJG/JMs5RQf8ZBMwK9I4SDf4HLfAKRCX5kia8yB/WejSleLgpHPPQ/lVRlPo5rcvez GgsN9rrnnIxJ96y13ZvT6I43AMeb8r/Talo3WAP5Cx9W/9mXQik400b162nOa53DKwRt 2GWk54U3rF6CGa6GjYTi52LX1jYRToS3AvTrwfrWHmWm1lQt4k3ZRRR1x6vD7i1AL5fd RXYaCnEsoB4ZbQpz18zbV+HCcPIuFiGW/3eCrU77lLK7Fj/fYa/Ykc7IOy7GJRg+4JXy ndDKYHdbAKMQDkbPtyaeTu44qxOMTEqLq4KALa58ZgaccdOdhR84nTXCUgtBTF5wXOeF M9OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qbBF41e7xbj05jv0VkSfkBqnTHSIsfTwzPVLew6oRlEHgqhwc O+J+5b655Vo4NUz4xG2tp6cGd1uiWqt/DA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyt79f5lFaBJKVVUtM+5Ca31qXUbaDd3GlLJCvyT2ssXODCO33c6R/9tfx6w0WpvrOhqZsl6w== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7b9d:: with SMTP id p29mr51961330qtu.75.1609335311417; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 05:35:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:e72:80a0:605d:243e:92dd:9289? ([2600:1700:e72:80a0:605d:243e:92dd:9289]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id d25sm27674309qkl.97.2020.12.30.05.35.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Dec 2020 05:35:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rename "sha1-foo" files To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_=c3=85gren?= Cc: Git Mailing List , "brian m. carlson" References: <4d1f5c59-db2c-3c88-f3ca-1edcdfb2f99e@gmail.com> From: Derrick Stolee Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 08:35:10 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:85.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/85.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 12/30/2020 3:01 AM, Martin Ågren wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 02:29, Derrick Stolee wrote: >> Oh, and I remembered the one semi-legitimate case to try for exact >> renames whenever possible: "git log --follow" will download fewer >> blobs in a blobless partial clone (--filter=blob:none). Of course, >> this only works if the rule is always followed and is not really a >> justification for doubling the number of your patches. > > Ok, I see. Well, if you and/or others feel we should aim for a 100% > rename, I don't mind splitting the patches. My gut reaction is along > your "only works if the rule is always followed", plus I wonder if there > are actually Git developers using a blobless partial clone of git.git > [other than for testing blobless partial clones]. The upside is so small, it is not worth re-rolling your series. I was just thinking out loud to justify my first gut reaction. Even in blobless clones, this is not a huge cost (as long as we didn't also add or remove enormous blobs). This behavior of "filling in the gaps" is expected we use the repository. Thanks, -Stolee