From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449641F461 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 19:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727290AbfEQTrt (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 15:47:49 -0400 Received: from bsmtp7.bon.at ([213.33.87.19]:5119 "EHLO bsmtp7.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726648AbfEQTrt (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 15:47:49 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp7.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 455JjZ3Dgzz5tlB; Fri, 17 May 2019 21:47:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9E720BA; Fri, 17 May 2019 21:47:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] userdiff.c & doc/gitattributes.txt: add Octave To: "LI, BO XUAN" Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , philipoakley@iee.org References: <20190511041331.51642-1-liboxuan@connect.hku.hk> <262eb1d4-a898-c6d0-8e04-ce6c58eaa4e6@kdbg.org> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 21:47:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 17.05.19 um 14:19 schrieb LI, BO XUAN: > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:34 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Johannes Sixt writes: >> >>> I'd prefer to keep this list at the minimum necessary as long as it is >>> hard-coded in C. >> >> Yeah, I know that feeling. > > So do we reach a consensus? Should I merge the Octave rules into Matlab rules? Yes, please, that would be very much appreciated. Bonus points if you add some test cases for the hunk header patterns to the t/t4018 directory. -- Hannes