From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754371F990 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729128AbgHFRwR (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 13:52:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40150 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726471AbgHFQbn (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:31:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com (mail-wm1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16C2C0F26C6 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id c19so6910739wmd.1 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:30:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:date:subject:fcc :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:to:cc; bh=8Uv5L8ZO4SIiYZuPxYS424mOf6Tt1woqeOSXLimKpxw=; b=ml7VPATG2yb5U82SA8tKf1dAH6kXou1NJe+L3eOh/FJv8EpNVHuKEyMUb2H3jXwsYG gW3dlyBw8EvIILeZFMoDpcIZHLi7X3DY+gY6G730jfaYsBBwUfnFReU2jPwEKHAaHRLO JYgvvzvC+D2Yo+rzAEIT91C/dWKcp5X6kChCses06yppqGsaNotRY5zzpr/wxqyup7Sv pfRZy21FAODqrg4QfNICyeC+nMcuc+1gVinlF0eAiBTst4EPiwyJuiDr/XR4SQhp3P93 xCMrCSXQLPlVgV7hyDruObJwPxj/HeVmDNFqqOVWCEYYOWMwX+6pFQa8T+FN2t9Nzwnh qzLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:date :subject:fcc:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:to:cc; bh=8Uv5L8ZO4SIiYZuPxYS424mOf6Tt1woqeOSXLimKpxw=; b=JwopNJfEKHaJ9U48unB2Tf7wX+QzHK+IDqRIkcbPHKNpeFEVO44hlsfgPvPP4zERIC 8XPLtkgTobBA0USYU89dBmsCHYHvnlmh5bZkAIbMtOUoUiPYMeirNrmI/sglvbSQ1POy NtxiaZMmQbrqnYWqLKK0O5l7xbQSoNpmpvQzm8GPpZlSpO7VcpUTT/mMv4Gc+ltrEr0M cJAmoTLtmYzDMfXcaWa1e3gxcfnYlYvTsyXs/0hoQEcVaoPxCit6qJ5RsZY3mvWnJ/wS ociYt2pSowZO8II5zq9C0b/gyiQygpr+9Cu9zGDp9/ty9+OJVW24WmVkl7AZSou3cxTv gniw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53286X5s3rQmgIjDNdUVhnRQUIic+hG2lzDc08lOyZoSlbsKEsYr joYA3cZibsFLtDZUEUJ4bTmJvY4e X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4wNtbzPPzp+s0SYVPdH44qhC8BUsvdtI7uKhgFF5o9AMlIjX76m47QPhd7661paGtNXKp/g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c105:: with SMTP id w5mr8556341wmi.146.1596731432439; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([13.74.141.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p6sm6712505wru.33.2020.08.06.09.30.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: From: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:30:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 8/9] maintenance: auto-size incremental-repack batch Fcc: Sent Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: sandals@crustytoothpaste.net, steadmon@google.com, jrnieder@gmail.com, peff@peff.net, congdanhqx@gmail.com, phillip.wood123@gmail.com, emilyshaffer@google.com, sluongng@gmail.com, jonathantanmy@google.com, Derrick Stolee , Derrick Stolee Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org From: Derrick Stolee When repacking during the 'incremental-repack' task, we use the --batch-size option in 'git multi-pack-index repack'. The initial setting used --batch-size=0 to repack everything into a single pack-file. This is not sustainable for a large repository. The amount of work required is also likely to use too many system resources for a background job. Update the 'incremental-repack' task by dynamically computing a --batch-size option based on the current pack-file structure. The dynamic default size is computed with this idea in mind for a client repository that was cloned from a very large remote: there is likely one "big" pack-file that was created at clone time. Thus, do not try repacking it as it is likely packed efficiently by the server. Instead, we select the second-largest pack-file, and create a batch size that is one larger than that pack-file. If there are three or more pack-files, then this guarantees that at least two will be combined into a new pack-file. Of course, this means that the second-largest pack-file size is likely to grow over time and may eventually surpass the initially-cloned pack-file. Recall that the pack-file batch is selected in a greedy manner: the packs are considered from oldest to newest and are selected if they have size smaller than the batch size until the total selected size is larger than the batch size. Thus, that oldest "clone" pack will be first to repack after the new data creates a pack larger than that. We also want to place some limits on how large these pack-files become, in order to bound the amount of time spent repacking. A maximum batch-size of two gigabytes means that large repositories will never be packed into a single pack-file using this job, but also that repack is rather expensive. This is a trade-off that is valuable to have if the maintenance is being run automatically or in the background. Users who truly want to optimize for space and performance (and are willing to pay the upfront cost of a full repack) can use the 'gc' task to do so. Create a test for this two gigabyte limit by creating an EXPENSIVE test that generates two pack-files of roughly 2.5 gigabytes in size, then performs an incremental repack. Check that the --batch-size argument in the subcommand uses the hard-coded maximum. Helped-by: Chris Torek Reported-by: Son Luong Ngoc Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee --- builtin/gc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t7900-maintenance.sh | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/builtin/gc.c b/builtin/gc.c index 35c6d7ce82..c09bc1381c 100644 --- a/builtin/gc.c +++ b/builtin/gc.c @@ -1094,6 +1094,46 @@ static int multi_pack_index_expire(struct maintenance_opts *opts) return 0; } +#define TWO_GIGABYTES (INT32_MAX) + +static off_t get_auto_pack_size(void) +{ + /* + * The "auto" value is special: we optimize for + * one large pack-file (i.e. from a clone) and + * expect the rest to be small and they can be + * repacked quickly. + * + * The strategy we select here is to select a + * size that is one more than the second largest + * pack-file. This ensures that we will repack + * at least two packs if there are three or more + * packs. + */ + off_t max_size = 0; + off_t second_largest_size = 0; + off_t result_size; + struct packed_git *p; + struct repository *r = the_repository; + + reprepare_packed_git(r); + for (p = get_all_packs(r); p; p = p->next) { + if (p->pack_size > max_size) { + second_largest_size = max_size; + max_size = p->pack_size; + } else if (p->pack_size > second_largest_size) + second_largest_size = p->pack_size; + } + + result_size = second_largest_size + 1; + + /* But limit ourselves to a batch size of 2g */ + if (result_size > TWO_GIGABYTES) + result_size = TWO_GIGABYTES; + + return result_size; +} + static int multi_pack_index_repack(struct maintenance_opts *opts) { struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT; @@ -1104,7 +1144,8 @@ static int multi_pack_index_repack(struct maintenance_opts *opts) if (opts->quiet) strvec_push(&child.args, "--no-progress"); - strvec_push(&child.args, "--batch-size=0"); + strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--batch-size=%"PRIuMAX, + (uintmax_t)get_auto_pack_size()); close_object_store(the_repository->objects); diff --git a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh index be19ac7623..1c5f44f2b3 100755 --- a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh +++ b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh @@ -179,10 +179,42 @@ test_expect_success 'incremental-repack task' ' test_line_count = 4 packs-between && # the job deletes the two old packs, and does not write - # a new one because only one pack remains. + # a new one because the batch size is not high enough to + # pack the largest pack-file. git maintenance run --task=incremental-repack && ls .git/objects/pack/*.pack >packs-after && - test_line_count = 1 packs-after + test_line_count = 2 packs-after +' + +test_expect_success EXPENSIVE 'incremental-repack 2g limit' ' + for i in $(test_seq 1 5) + do + test-tool genrandom foo$i $((512 * 1024 * 1024 + 1)) >>big || + return 1 + done && + git add big && + git commit -m "Add big file (1)" && + + # ensure any possible loose objects are in a pack-file + git maintenance run --task=loose-objects && + + rm big && + for i in $(test_seq 6 10) + do + test-tool genrandom foo$i $((512 * 1024 * 1024 + 1)) >>big || + return 1 + done && + git add big && + git commit -m "Add big file (2)" && + + # ensure any possible loose objects are in a pack-file + git maintenance run --task=loose-objects && + + # Now run the incremental-repack task and check the batch-size + GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/run-2g.txt" git maintenance run \ + --task=incremental-repack 2>/dev/null && + test_subcommand git multi-pack-index repack \ + --no-progress --batch-size=2147483647