From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED451F453 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728076AbeJTD6D (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 23:58:03 -0400 Received: from siwi.pair.com ([209.68.5.199]:45325 "EHLO siwi.pair.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727767AbeJTD6D (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 23:58:03 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 581 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 23:58:03 EDT Received: from siwi.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by siwi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4878A3F40F1; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [IPv6:2001:4898:6808:13e:b142:7803:a30c:e413] (unknown [IPv6:2001:4898:8010:0:9a78:7803:a30c:e413]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by siwi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18FFA3F400E; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] commit-reach: fix first-parent heuristic To: Junio C Hamano , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget Cc: git@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jeff Hostetler Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:40:51 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 10/18/2018 10:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes: > >> I originally reported this fix [1] after playing around with the trace2 >> series for measuring performance. Since trace2 isn't merging quickly, I >> pulled the performance fix patch out and am sending it on its own. The only >> difference here is that we don't have the tracing to verify the performance >> fix in the test script. > > Thanks for sending this separately. What's the current status of > the tracing patch series, by the way? > I'm still working on it. I hope to reroll and submit a new version next week. We are currently dogfooding a version of it with our gvfs users. Jeff